From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E8F52E6CA5; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 08:07:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756886866; cv=none; b=AifADRGnSWcggVlWE0K2Hby2d0PJPy7ekCIeIESZAvg6YAvEfA33RFYQRLWtWQCV13cvS3VDxS3HZiht4bgKmKD9qPXOUAXzjIdJM28nQOdCL0x8C32WdvoFS04McbxUfb01JM0pH2d4tUuZSF6Qnv9tXoO8o2a46R0W1eNoMQQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756886866; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oylBBl4uKf15Rl0dYmoe29/A3Jm+GijZDxeRqxsoIuk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=W8rkjFgkqx3+l2lbymLv6YvP6mwzVH+TlML1GsvplzYUZxcdwqmXk/mONd+QnOasy6YO/9VbceADvASgxrNv2iY1ZxZf+W4wks+nu8QLYOrV7wZM819NOyMw7BanmB6wXW13hqFv3nYecLyMhDb2UX/0lTCUkmVLz4zBYpyrUtg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fOMd+ClN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fOMd+ClN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1FBAC4CEF0; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 08:07:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756886865; bh=oylBBl4uKf15Rl0dYmoe29/A3Jm+GijZDxeRqxsoIuk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=fOMd+ClNOmVD1CadlRsVv0U/kNNM90vCdRtGb6WjRtylHsNfhk4PSkXUKmwOkDR/C vK48IXNSmvJhLfUAgQPZ4/Y3gTzF25nlGstPL81xMIuO/7arwJ3LmTesSNWB+nttjK Ea6DUGKQxzQIFZv+bWSFfZZxF0Xl9yYk0DiPAaDFm/SVZ7gKl7jCHYView402MQGca kDy41ZypNz7JVgrDCl3LO1M+UUCKtCC2YJO36/Rk4Di2pPGL8W6e+VPhPjqp8sNzH1 th8NXA9hTBowv0+eWIwYAV4IsxdLsWDBYykKOEV6FUNl3jIMvxOJrKr9BcIaS8YEiU xTiHdPu2j49Uw== Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 09:07:41 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Linus Walleij , Liviu Dudau , Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Pawel Moll , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: vexpress: convert the driver to using the new generic GPIO chip API Message-ID: <20250903080741.GD2163762@google.com> References: <20250811-gpio-mmio-mfd-conv-v1-0-68c5c958cf80@linaro.org> <175680785548.2247963.242433624241359060.b4-ty@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Tue, 02 Sep 2025, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 12:10 PM Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 15:36:15 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > This converts the vexpress-sysreg MFD driver to using the new generic > > > GPIO interface but first fixes an issue with an unchecked return value > > > of devm_gpiochio_add_data(). > > > > > > Lee: Please, create an immutable branch containing these commits after > > > you pick them up, as I'd like to merge it into the GPIO tree and remove > > > the legacy interface in this cycle. > > > > > > [...] > > > > Applied, thanks! > > > > [1/2] mfd: vexpress-sysreg: check the return value of devm_gpiochip_add_data() > > commit: 14b2b50be20bd15236bc7d4c614ecb5d9410c3ec > > [2/2] mfd: vexpress-sysreg: use new generic GPIO chip API > > commit: 8080e2c6138e4c615c1e6bc1378ec042b6f9cd36 > > > > -- > > Lee Jones [李琼斯] > > > > Thanks, you haven't pushed out the changes yet so maybe you're already > on it but please don't forget to set up an immutable branch for > merging back of these changes into the GPIO tree. No, I actually missed that. 2 secs. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]