From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F8FB285069; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 06:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756968498; cv=none; b=C2Dediy7u2R6KsMeorhoTatBEBJEJ4LL75AyHx9B5Qe8OcVUjeHcU9PGwA1z5TfSL6SDoZ1gQitdrE3hGto6rYOgPr2Da5xZ5wqTi4edhpO4DWH8MyIBWq/tXDO3UUQi+LtXw5b1Nai4iTxXi/EdbG8oSn0iNdypUngYRR1+h5k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756968498; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WyIvrOVDNWf5X8qTZLswd5dlm0L7vHB640A5eFNHu8Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hPc5pIavln/dA2OGyvU6mecN0MvhOqMkDe1XWXPALVdxBFl0fcE9K3N9lNkKfqxeIs5RBU0D3WYVGM5+QUXoeSe6zGw2S7md3W92D2zrAVovGXz0yfJp+1Z442sJcJnWTRV5bKujOJZUd8y5txlyF01cn61L3NRVDEBfQfCkvlc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VKF40z36; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VKF40z36" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 107DBC4CEF0; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 06:48:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756968496; bh=WyIvrOVDNWf5X8qTZLswd5dlm0L7vHB640A5eFNHu8Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VKF40z36T6RfMUh5C1AQd4nbgMrAgm0MeJh780thFPYJbKuSL0apzCOU7eP15cHUK kKm5/Dejsjsy6TfPgf0zobV/ssA91J8UYmFvtpaRcUAWot99NvbxHuzx1JQEGKFI58 QiiL0ok7G5sQSlo8yvQkPEQuS88rzE1HcgPzWmNuI1Ito7lyj/jVpZ4v3jh3HHOZYA SbnveT0uf1mhQkjGNzzBPrZiVfd1dH5QTeAL8Sj8fmkJFB/mA1ig3njRVkWqUw2Xbg iEaN3gGOGDzF2JpzLMRwW1iT1xPXR8bgc1/8gSlkA+U/icaAippFP4/wLerAesmnDW GWNpLB3ZFLi5Q== Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 08:48:14 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Pritam Manohar Sutar Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, kishon@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, andre.draszik@linaro.org, peter.griffin@linaro.org, kauschluss@disroot.org, ivo.ivanov.ivanov1@gmail.com, igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, rosa.pila@samsung.com, dev.tailor@samsung.com, faraz.ata@samsung.com, muhammed.ali@samsung.com, selvarasu.g@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 HS phy compatible Message-ID: <20250904-interesting-lovely-ringtail-38bbef@kuoka> References: <20250903073827.3015662-1-pritam.sutar@samsung.com> <20250903073827.3015662-2-pritam.sutar@samsung.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250903073827.3015662-2-pritam.sutar@samsung.com> On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 01:08:22PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote: > Document support for the USB20 phy found on the ExynosAutov920 SoC. The > USB20 phy is functionally identical to that on the Exynos850 SoC, so no > driver changes are needed to support this phy. However, add a dedicated > compatible string for USB20 phy found in this SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Pritam Manohar Sutar You just dropped all tags without explaining why.
This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply. Please read: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Best regards, Krzysztof