From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com>
Cc: clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Avoid potential out-of-bounds in btrfs_encode_fh()
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:45:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250909224520.GC5333@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0cc81bcf-b830-4ec3-8d5e-67afbc2e7c47@allelesecurity.com>
On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 09:49:02AM -0300, Anderson Nascimento wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The function btrfs_encode_fh() does not properly account for the three
> cases it handles.
>
> Before writing to the file handle (fh), the function only returns to the
> user BTRFS_FID_SIZE_NON_CONNECTABLE (5 dwords, 20 bytes) or
> BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE (8 dwords, 32 bytes).
>
> However, when a parent exists and the root ID of the parent and the
> inode are different, the function writes BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT
> (10 dwords, 40 bytes).
>
> If *max_len is not large enough, this write goes out of bounds because
> BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT is greater than
> BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE originally returned.
>
> This results in an 8-byte out-of-bounds write at
> fid->parent_root_objectid = parent_root_id.
>
> A previous attempt to fix this issue was made but was lost.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/4CADAEEC020000780001B32C@vpn.id2.novell.com/
>
> Although this issue does not seem to be easily triggerable, it is a
> potential memory corruption bug that should be fixed. This patch
> resolves the issue by ensuring the function returns the appropriate size
> for all three cases and validates that *max_len is large enough before
> writing any data.
>
> Tested on v6.17-rc4.
>
> Fixes: be6e8dc0ba84 ("NFS support for btrfs - v3")
> Signed-off-by: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com>
Thanks for finding the problem and the fix. It's 17 years old though the
other patch was sent about 2 years after btrfs merge to linux kernel.
I'll add it to for-next, with the minor whitespace issues fixed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-08 12:49 Anderson Nascimento
2025-09-09 22:45 ` David Sterba [this message]
2025-09-09 23:39 ` Anderson Nascimento
2025-09-23 14:37 ` Anderson Nascimento
2025-09-23 15:11 ` David Sterba
2025-09-23 15:55 ` Anderson Nascimento
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250909224520.GC5333@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=anderson@allelesecurity.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®