mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com>
Cc: clm@fb.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, dsterba@suse.com,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Avoid potential out-of-bounds in btrfs_encode_fh()
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:45:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250909224520.GC5333@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0cc81bcf-b830-4ec3-8d5e-67afbc2e7c47@allelesecurity.com>

On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 09:49:02AM -0300, Anderson Nascimento wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> The function btrfs_encode_fh() does not properly account for the three 
> cases it handles.
> 
> Before writing to the file handle (fh), the function only returns to the 
> user BTRFS_FID_SIZE_NON_CONNECTABLE (5 dwords, 20 bytes) or 
> BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE (8 dwords, 32 bytes).
> 
> However, when a parent exists and the root ID of the parent and the 
> inode are different, the function writes BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT 
> (10 dwords, 40 bytes).
> 
> If *max_len is not large enough, this write goes out of bounds because 
> BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE_ROOT is greater than 
> BTRFS_FID_SIZE_CONNECTABLE originally returned.
> 
> This results in an 8-byte out-of-bounds write at 
> fid->parent_root_objectid = parent_root_id.
> 
> A previous attempt to fix this issue was made but was lost.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/4CADAEEC020000780001B32C@vpn.id2.novell.com/
> 
> Although this issue does not seem to be easily triggerable, it is a 
> potential memory corruption bug that should be fixed. This patch 
> resolves the issue by ensuring the function returns the appropriate size 
> for all three cases and validates that *max_len is large enough before 
> writing any data.
> 
> Tested on v6.17-rc4.
> 
> Fixes: be6e8dc0ba84 ("NFS support for btrfs - v3")
> Signed-off-by: Anderson Nascimento <anderson@allelesecurity.com>

Thanks for finding the problem and the fix. It's 17 years old though the
other patch was sent about 2 years after btrfs merge to linux kernel.
I'll add it to for-next, with the minor whitespace issues fixed.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-08 12:49 Anderson Nascimento
2025-09-09 22:45 ` David Sterba [this message]
2025-09-09 23:39   ` Anderson Nascimento
2025-09-23 14:37   ` Anderson Nascimento
2025-09-23 15:11     ` David Sterba
2025-09-23 15:55       ` Anderson Nascimento

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250909224520.GC5333@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=anderson@allelesecurity.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®