From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com (mail-ej1-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B89B30C63A for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.43 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758101296; cv=none; b=IBuNnfs808cJy1iN6fqduQMkgcaSUVuMIaY4BIGFeiktP6pcTIQn9ODt29qKuQ2Vdwz+0P8DmuaIBqHa2vJmjOJrXA1zt1NfhBfke9u0IZuJov4WVOFPo8ETQUgCTRt9M6SVJamk+oU6ragxHLnfTK1DgqRzAYiGDbWHbgPzmdg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758101296; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BvQk4uuZWQQsyS0bgCtnD8Q2EwGdUDl2hTU4IVjcj60=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=d5prTmSPp9j7PmbgMqroK5AePyVO11ix0yv8pE6fsZu52QILUXbMHsaujIGQAopl79iT0EXvq/tozPPQa/PnFFy5p1ncxNwsB8j8ZWhsKM1hgwyF/2CoSESSNQH8m2A+wc4mcFDH4pwMWaTIxjJs66HQTD0UHNeUPM19pmklGyw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=JVBdaj0v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.43 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="JVBdaj0v" Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b00f6705945so90661766b.1 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 02:28:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1758101292; x=1758706092; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=o12PIdH5jrLINYaBDIAtrFJQyb2acUWsg9n32mRR/5k=; b=JVBdaj0v/hbdVqguRjn5NCfyLNTxtb92X6WozyadXPvjm1nA2NMlGS90yPHrzAmhga 1Lyoabc15pQmnhheTJOk4wcAHWmO+CgdNy6s8LEFAZvzGZekBr6sdob1FCrxJ7rh0ZmX I9Srq9Hzkn6SxPg666qvtIiJ2eWYT9jVlM2ZngQcMGRjjPIQCaKglmuPDHglI0ExRBP9 KYp4XiqR+xoVDPRtx8+s1ob69xsjHM/BffPrSGs1fXHZnXGflZOHliwsH2F7UWtsAa5s ExtsxTARDKVsO+Sav4OiaCVvP+EvkcVDh23Pa4bmIEXVVulzMmXXuEnHc8VpFgvTI/4H 8TGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758101292; x=1758706092; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=o12PIdH5jrLINYaBDIAtrFJQyb2acUWsg9n32mRR/5k=; b=lf4vtEl3VZ6N0uERfOGXtZQsQMStXMpkpe2QOoD3G1Dkmr6fCBFqnlB3MfNy0c3ddA i9/zW3taCflmwwH3GtTsL2gb92zaqtWrZbn8DfiNgN7+RE99IMHja+52p1iuWDS84Dxt N6WPq0nzuN/Ota/HdmKGaTb8WMkNJaiIku4L3XLB/I20vD+DQ4v4z5mYBphgGvJr4DUn 4cIO8U387/5pCXt9bKMzh04wPXqN3IOLiHCFrpczMRWvtxw4EkhczkROT9zhRviZ+6AI bBkbuRK1t4pgzkctiaXI/G0hAT4/LUd5ckMOazJ6PDlvW+MpVuatggr0kEe8eKJN6ooq sPug== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWosjMLhNDt55FcfjR6RLWGRjcusL1h2ZmpWlmnzn5LKAl1eZnNdOe0d2+Lv221MPqp+ciSwFJRR6Mhhf4=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxgOPhKMFcURKUlcSKZfqJ7U8VOKHUFqoUe5VtGZO1G8xotOP1O q2/f6/094c+K9XutLISb0Sz3geGquP4pAzHx4BDtYv2xmuKHHkD+X7Bc X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvO2PwXf9zudh9X3rNltv8O3xE/p4URHVT7baeJ8D64urrcn88V1w6fZ2KAZrc pYWX/F5nxdVokIZ4tCsPi9KYbMqAkHGtBHqdm8boZYgT4/RMPSQhmzOSXH9IYweiP8ASTjvk3z2 OuZROvj+ks259qY1eqhL7bqSTHz781fwm1d9LvvJnBhWCq8gElbD0HrI8JISZIWCC2OFCL4zgPR Jfmoz4tH4K0k2h6TVZiSyaNubBGVfevH2i4Mqv4cw2+z2S3wHrCEsXMM/U7NAsK0i5C7cRIPci1 oIVTfC8gWFWzGpKp6E3W8Rg0hJoyBIhM23RzRk2QXNjQB5vDJZH9ZPs1E/rooJn7tBpWUkzl+4X mpvm8iEeDAUtg0IQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHvszT87WzP63vcOaexO/pLxfMWcRX57JUYYOxi6z+V5togEaPi0QjDbwzVUWpwnuisJKwZww== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7f9f:b0:b04:7b5b:850a with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b1bb5598e03mr85457666b.4.1758101292043; Wed, 17 Sep 2025 02:28:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([2a02:2f04:d005:3b00:8bcc:b603:fee7:a273]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-b1c40fe2df8sm74103266b.18.2025.09.17.02.28.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Sep 2025 02:28:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:28:07 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Christian Marangi Cc: Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Simon Horman , "Chester A. Unal" , Daniel Golle , DENG Qingfang , Sean Wang , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v18 0/8] net: dsa: Add Airoha AN8855 support Message-ID: <20250917092807.uui2qwva2sqbe6sp@skbuf> References: <20250915104545.1742-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250915104545.1742-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 12:45:36PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote: > It's conceptually similar to mediatek switch but register and bits > are different. And there is massive list of register for the PCS > configuration. > Saddly for that part we have absolutely NO documentation currently. Please add in the next revision a more convincing argument for not reusing the mt7530 driver control flow. Regmap fields can abstract a lot, and the driver can select a completely different phylink_pcs for different hardware. I don't see in the short change log included here any mentions related to the mt7530, but I'm not going to search the mailing lists since Nov 2024 for any previous discussions about this... Also, let's try not to reach v20.. Please try to collect a full round of feedback from people who commented before when submitting a new version, pinging people if necessary. You want to make sure that their previous feedback was addressed. > TEST: lan2: Multicast IPv4 to joined group [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group [XFAIL] > reception succeeded, but should have failed > TEST: lan2: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: Multicast IPv6 to joined group [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group [XFAIL] > reception succeeded, but should have failed > TEST: lan2: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Sync [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Follow-Up [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Peer Delay Request [ OK ] > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over IPv4, Sync [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over IPv4, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over IPv4, Peer Delay Request [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over IPv6, Sync [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over IPv6, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: lan2: 1588v2 over IPv6, Peer Delay Request [FAIL] > reception failed Do you know why it won't receive PTP over IP? It seems strange, given it receives other IP multicast (even unregistered). Is it a hardware or a software drop? What port counters increment? Does it drop PTP over IP only on local termination, or does it also fail to forward it? What about the packet makes the switch drop it? > TEST: vlan_filtering=1 bridge: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: vlan_filtering=1 bridge: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Unicast IPv4 to primary MAC address [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Unicast IPv4 to macvlan MAC address [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Multicast IPv4 to joined group [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group [XFAIL] > reception succeeded, but should have failed > TEST: VLAN upper: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Multicast IPv6 to joined group [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group [XFAIL] > reception succeeded, but should have failed > TEST: VLAN upper: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Sync [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Peer Delay Request [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over IPv4, Sync [FAIL] > reception failed > ;TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over IPv4, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over IPv4, Peer Delay Request [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over IPv6, Sync [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over IPv6, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN upper: 1588v2 over IPv6, Peer Delay Request [FAIL] > reception failed The same thing happens with VLAN too... > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: Multicast IPv4 to joined group [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group [XFAIL] > reception succeeded, but should have failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: Multicast IPv6 to joined group [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group [XFAIL] > reception succeeded, but should have failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Sync [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Follow-Up [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Peer Delay Request [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv4, Sync [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv4, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv4, Peer Delay Request [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv6, Sync [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv6, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=0 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv6, Peer Delay Request [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Multicast IPv4 to joined group [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group [XFAIL] > reception succeeded, but should have failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Multicast IPv4 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Multicast IPv6 to joined group [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group [XFAIL] > reception succeeded, but should have failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, promisc [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Multicast IPv6 to unknown group, allmulti [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Sync [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Follow-Up [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over L2 transport, Peer Delay Request [ OK ] > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv4, Sync [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv4, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv4, Peer Delay Request [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv6, Sync [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv6, Follow-Up [FAIL] > reception failed > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: 1588v2 over IPv6, Peer Delay Request [FAIL] > reception failed And over bridge ports...