From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] page_pool: add debug for release to cache from wrong CPU
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:13:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250918091341.n6_OgbOW@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918084823.372000-1-dtatulea@nvidia.com>
On 2025-09-18 11:48:21 [+0300], Dragos Tatulea wrote:
> diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
> index ba70569bd4b0..404064d893d6 100644
> --- a/net/core/page_pool.c
> +++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
> @@ -768,6 +795,18 @@ static bool page_pool_recycle_in_cache(netmem_ref netmem,
> return false;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_POOL_CACHE_RELEASE
> + if (unlikely(!page_pool_napi_local(pool))) {
if you do IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_POOL_CACHE_RELEASE) you could
avoid the ifdef.
A quick question, where is this allow_direct argument supposed to come
from? I just noticed that mlx5 does
page_pool_put_unrefed_netmem(, true);
which then does not consider page_pool_napi_local(). But your proposed
change here will complain as it should.
> + u32 pp_cpuid = READ_ONCE(pool->cpuid);
> + u32 cpuid = smp_processor_id();
> +
> + WARN_RATELIMIT(1, "page_pool %d: direct page release from wrong CPU %d, expected CPU %d",
> + pool->user.id, cpuid, pp_cpuid);
> +
> + return false;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> /* Caller MUST have verified/know (page_ref_count(page) == 1) */
> pool->alloc.cache[pool->alloc.count++] = netmem;
> recycle_stat_inc(pool, cached);
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 8:48 Dragos Tatulea
2025-09-18 9:13 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2025-09-18 9:51 ` Dragos Tatulea
2025-09-19 23:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-20 9:25 ` Dragos Tatulea
2025-09-22 23:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-23 15:23 ` Dragos Tatulea
2025-09-23 15:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-23 16:00 ` Dragos Tatulea
2025-09-23 23:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-20 17:36 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2025-09-22 17:18 ` Dragos Tatulea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250918091341.n6_OgbOW@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®