Re: [TECH TOPIC] vfio, iommufd: Enabling user space drivers to vend more granular access to client processes

[Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>]

On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 05:24:54PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> I read this as more about having the granularity to automatically
> release resources associated with a client process when it dies (as
> mentioned below) rather than relying on the bootstrapping process to
> manage it all. Not really about hostile ioctls, but that an ungraceful
> ending of some client workload doesn't even send them.

You could achieve this between co-operating processes by monitoring
the child with a pidfd, or handing it a pipe and watching for the pipe
to close..

> > > - It would be nice if mappings created with the restricted IOMMU fd were
> > >   automatically freed when the underlying kernel object was freed (if the client
> > >   process were to exit ungracefully without explicitly performing unmap cleanup
> > >   after itself).
> > 
> > Maybe the BPF could trigger an eventfd or something when the FD closes?
> 
> I wouldn't have considered a BPF dependency for this. I'll need to think
> about that one for a moment.

Well, if you are going to be using BPF for policy then may as well use
it for all policy. It would not be hard to also invoke the BPF duing
the file descriptor close and presumably it can somehow to signal the
vendor process in some easy BPF way?

Jason