mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 07/12] clk: test: introduce helper to create a mock mux
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:39:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-7-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-0-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com>

Introduce a helper to create a mock mux to reduce code duplication.
This also changes it so that the relevant clk_hws are registered with
the kunit framework.

Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index 5fb908a8c764f3c3d2c744022bd61e6307c890c2..a330de8bd8dc2cdda558d364a3c6d87a26791c8d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -538,45 +538,64 @@ static struct kunit_suite clk_uncached_test_suite = {
 	.test_cases = clk_uncached_test_cases,
 };
 
-static int
-clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
-{
-	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx;
-	const char *parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1"};
+static int clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(struct kunit *test,
+					struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx,
+					const char *parent0_name,
+					unsigned long parent0_rate,
+					const char *parent1_name,
+					unsigned long parent1_rate,
+					const char *mux_name, int mux_flags,
+					const struct clk_ops *mux_ops)
+{
+	const struct clk_hw *parents[2];
 	int ret;
 
-	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ctx)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	test->priv = ctx;
-
-	ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0",
+	ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT(parent0_name,
 							    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
 							    0);
-	ctx->parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1;
+	ctx->parents_ctx[0].rate = parent0_rate;
 	ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1",
+	ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT(parent1_name,
 							    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
 							    0);
-	ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2;
+	ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = parent1_rate;
 	ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	ctx->current_parent = 0;
-	ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", parents,
-					   &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops,
-					   CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
+	parents[0] = &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw;
+	parents[1] = &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw;
+	ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS_HW(mux_name, parents,
+					      mux_ops, mux_flags);
 	ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->hw);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	ctx->current_parent = 0;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int
+clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx;
+
+	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	test->priv = ctx;
+
+	return clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(test, ctx,
+					    "parent-0", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+					    "parent-1", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2,
+					    "test-mux", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+					    &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops);
+}
+
 /*
  * Test that for a clock with multiple parents, clk_get_parent()
  * actually returns the current one.
@@ -2541,7 +2560,6 @@ static int
 clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct clk_leaf_mux_ctx *ctx;
-	const char *top_parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1" };
 	int ret;
 
 	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2549,27 +2567,11 @@ clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	test->priv = ctx;
 
-	ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0",
-								    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
-								    0);
-	ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1;
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1",
-								    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
-								    0);
-	ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2;
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	ctx->mux_ctx.current_parent = 0;
-	ctx->mux_ctx.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", top_parents,
-						   &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops,
-						   0);
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.hw);
+	ret = clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(test, &ctx->mux_ctx,
+					   "parent-0", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+					   "parent-1", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2,
+					   "test-mux", 0,
+					   &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -2757,7 +2759,6 @@ static int clk_mux_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
 static int clk_mux_notifier_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct clk_mux_notifier_ctx *ctx;
-	const char *top_parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1" };
 	int ret;
 
 	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2768,27 +2769,11 @@ static int clk_mux_notifier_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 	init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->pre_rate_change.wq);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->post_rate_change.wq);
 
-	ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0",
-								    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
-								    0);
-	ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1;
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1",
-								    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
-								    0);
-	ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2;
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	ctx->mux_ctx.current_parent = 0;
-	ctx->mux_ctx.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", top_parents,
-						   &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops,
-						   0);
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.hw);
+	ret = clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(test, &ctx->mux_ctx,
+					   "parent-0", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+					   "parent-1", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2,
+					   "test-mux", 0,
+					   &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -2871,39 +2856,17 @@ static int
 clk_mux_no_reparent_test_init(struct kunit *test)
 {
 	struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx;
-	const char *parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1"};
-	int ret;
 
 	ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ctx)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	test->priv = ctx;
 
-	ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0",
-							    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
-							    0);
-	ctx->parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1;
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1",
-							    &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
-							    0);
-	ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2;
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	ctx->current_parent = 0;
-	ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", parents,
-					   &clk_multiple_parents_no_reparent_mux_ops,
-					   0);
-	ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
-
-	return 0;
+	return clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(test, ctx,
+					    "parent-0", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+					    "parent-1", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2,
+					    "test-mux", 0,
+					    &clk_multiple_parents_no_reparent_mux_ops);
 }
 
 static void

-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 14:39 [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/12] clk: add kernel docs for struct clk_core Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/12] clk: test: convert constants to use HZ_PER_MHZ Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/12] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_div for a mock divider Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/12] clk: test: introduce test suite for sibling rate changes on a divider Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/12] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_gate for a mock gate Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/12] clk: test: introduce test suite for sibling rate changes on a gate Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` Brian Masney [this message]
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/12] clk: test: introduce test variation for sibling rate changes on a mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/12] clk: test: introduce test variation for sibling rate changes on a gate/mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/12] clk: add support for v2 rate negotiation Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/12] clk: test: introduce negotiate_rates() op for clk_dummy and clk_dummy_div Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/12] clk: test: update divider kunit tests for v1 and v2 rate negotiation Brian Masney
2025-09-25 10:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests Brian Masney
2025-09-25 12:14 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-09-25 14:20   ` Brian Masney
2025-09-30 11:28     ` Maxime Ripard
2025-11-15  0:22       ` Brian Masney
2025-11-21 16:09         ` Maxime Ripard
2025-11-21 20:35           ` Brian Masney
2025-12-19  0:03             ` Follow up from Linux Plumbers about my clk rate change talk (was Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests) Brian Masney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-7-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com \
    --to=bmasney@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®