From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 07/12] clk: test: introduce helper to create a mock mux
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 10:39:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-7-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-0-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com>
Introduce a helper to create a mock mux to reduce code duplication.
This also changes it so that the relevant clk_hws are registered with
the kunit framework.
Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index 5fb908a8c764f3c3d2c744022bd61e6307c890c2..a330de8bd8dc2cdda558d364a3c6d87a26791c8d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -538,45 +538,64 @@ static struct kunit_suite clk_uncached_test_suite = {
.test_cases = clk_uncached_test_cases,
};
-static int
-clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
-{
- struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx;
- const char *parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1"};
+static int clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(struct kunit *test,
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx,
+ const char *parent0_name,
+ unsigned long parent0_rate,
+ const char *parent1_name,
+ unsigned long parent1_rate,
+ const char *mux_name, int mux_flags,
+ const struct clk_ops *mux_ops)
+{
+ const struct clk_hw *parents[2];
int ret;
- ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!ctx)
- return -ENOMEM;
- test->priv = ctx;
-
- ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0",
+ ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT(parent0_name,
&clk_dummy_rate_ops,
0);
- ctx->parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1;
+ ctx->parents_ctx[0].rate = parent0_rate;
ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1",
+ ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT(parent1_name,
&clk_dummy_rate_ops,
0);
- ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2;
+ ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = parent1_rate;
ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw);
if (ret)
return ret;
- ctx->current_parent = 0;
- ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", parents,
- &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops,
- CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
+ parents[0] = &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw;
+ parents[1] = &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw;
+ ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS_HW(mux_name, parents,
+ mux_ops, mux_flags);
ret = clk_hw_register_kunit(test, NULL, &ctx->hw);
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ctx->current_parent = 0;
+
return 0;
}
+static int
+clk_multiple_parents_mux_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx;
+
+ ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ctx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ test->priv = ctx;
+
+ return clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(test, ctx,
+ "parent-0", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+ "parent-1", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2,
+ "test-mux", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+ &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops);
+}
+
/*
* Test that for a clock with multiple parents, clk_get_parent()
* actually returns the current one.
@@ -2541,7 +2560,6 @@ static int
clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_init(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_leaf_mux_ctx *ctx;
- const char *top_parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1" };
int ret;
ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2549,27 +2567,11 @@ clk_leaf_mux_set_rate_parent_test_init(struct kunit *test)
return -ENOMEM;
test->priv = ctx;
- ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0",
- &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
- 0);
- ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1;
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1",
- &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
- 0);
- ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2;
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ctx->mux_ctx.current_parent = 0;
- ctx->mux_ctx.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", top_parents,
- &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops,
- 0);
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.hw);
+ ret = clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(test, &ctx->mux_ctx,
+ "parent-0", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+ "parent-1", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2,
+ "test-mux", 0,
+ &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2757,7 +2759,6 @@ static int clk_mux_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
static int clk_mux_notifier_test_init(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_mux_notifier_ctx *ctx;
- const char *top_parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1" };
int ret;
ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -2768,27 +2769,11 @@ static int clk_mux_notifier_test_init(struct kunit *test)
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->pre_rate_change.wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->post_rate_change.wq);
- ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0",
- &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
- 0);
- ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1;
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[0].hw);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1",
- &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
- 0);
- ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2;
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.parents_ctx[1].hw);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ctx->mux_ctx.current_parent = 0;
- ctx->mux_ctx.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", top_parents,
- &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops,
- 0);
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->mux_ctx.hw);
+ ret = clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(test, &ctx->mux_ctx,
+ "parent-0", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+ "parent-1", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2,
+ "test-mux", 0,
+ &clk_multiple_parents_mux_ops);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -2871,39 +2856,17 @@ static int
clk_mux_no_reparent_test_init(struct kunit *test)
{
struct clk_multiple_parent_ctx *ctx;
- const char *parents[2] = { "parent-0", "parent-1"};
- int ret;
ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ctx)
return -ENOMEM;
test->priv = ctx;
- ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-0",
- &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
- 0);
- ctx->parents_ctx[0].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1;
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[0].hw);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_NO_PARENT("parent-1",
- &clk_dummy_rate_ops,
- 0);
- ctx->parents_ctx[1].rate = DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2;
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->parents_ctx[1].hw);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ctx->current_parent = 0;
- ctx->hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS("test-mux", parents,
- &clk_multiple_parents_no_reparent_mux_ops,
- 0);
- ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, &ctx->hw);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- return 0;
+ return clk_init_multiple_parent_ctx(test, ctx,
+ "parent-0", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_1,
+ "parent-1", DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_2,
+ "test-mux", 0,
+ &clk_multiple_parents_no_reparent_mux_ops);
}
static void
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 14:39 [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 01/12] clk: add kernel docs for struct clk_core Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 02/12] clk: test: convert constants to use HZ_PER_MHZ Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 03/12] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_div for a mock divider Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 04/12] clk: test: introduce test suite for sibling rate changes on a divider Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 05/12] clk: test: introduce clk_dummy_gate for a mock gate Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 06/12] clk: test: introduce test suite for sibling rate changes on a gate Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` Brian Masney [this message]
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 08/12] clk: test: introduce test variation for sibling rate changes on a mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 09/12] clk: test: introduce test variation for sibling rate changes on a gate/mux Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 10/12] clk: add support for v2 rate negotiation Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 11/12] clk: test: introduce negotiate_rates() op for clk_dummy and clk_dummy_div Brian Masney
2025-09-23 14:39 ` [PATCH RFC v4 12/12] clk: test: update divider kunit tests for v1 and v2 rate negotiation Brian Masney
2025-09-25 10:31 ` [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests Brian Masney
2025-09-25 12:14 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-09-25 14:20 ` Brian Masney
2025-09-30 11:28 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-11-15 0:22 ` Brian Masney
2025-11-21 16:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2025-11-21 20:35 ` Brian Masney
2025-12-19 0:03 ` Follow up from Linux Plumbers about my clk rate change talk (was Re: [PATCH RFC v4 00/12] clk: add support for v1 / v2 clock rate negotiation and kunit tests) Brian Masney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250923-clk-tests-docs-v4-7-9205cb3d3cba@redhat.com \
--to=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®