mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/3] selftests/bpf: Refactor stacktrace_map case with skeleton
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 00:58:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250923165849.1524622-2-chen.dylane@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923165849.1524622-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev>

The loading method of the stacktrace_map test case looks too outdated,
refactor it with skeleton and replace control_map with control global
variable.

Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c | 60 +++++++------------
 ...test_stacktrace_map.c => stacktrace_map.c} | 15 ++---
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
 rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{test_stacktrace_map.c => stacktrace_map.c} (83%)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c
index 84a7e405e91..26a2bd25a6f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c
@@ -1,53 +1,39 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include "stacktrace_map.skel.h"
 
 void test_stacktrace_map(void)
 {
-	int control_map_fd, stackid_hmap_fd, stackmap_fd, stack_amap_fd;
-	const char *prog_name = "oncpu";
-	int err, prog_fd, stack_trace_len;
-	const char *file = "./test_stacktrace_map.bpf.o";
-	__u32 key, val, duration = 0;
-	struct bpf_program *prog;
-	struct bpf_object *obj;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
+	struct stacktrace_map *skel;
+	int stackid_hmap_fd, stackmap_fd, stack_amap_fd;
+	int err, stack_trace_len;
+	__u32 duration = 0;
 
-	err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, &obj, &prog_fd);
-	if (CHECK(err, "prog_load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
+	skel = stacktrace_map__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_and_load"))
 		return;
 
-	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(obj, prog_name);
-	if (CHECK(!prog, "find_prog", "prog '%s' not found\n", prog_name))
-		goto close_prog;
-
-	link = bpf_program__attach_tracepoint(prog, "sched", "sched_switch");
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_tp"))
-		goto close_prog;
-
 	/* find map fds */
-	control_map_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "control_map");
-	if (CHECK_FAIL(control_map_fd < 0))
-		goto disable_pmu;
-
-	stackid_hmap_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "stackid_hmap");
+	stackid_hmap_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.stackid_hmap);
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(stackid_hmap_fd < 0))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
-	stackmap_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "stackmap");
+	stackmap_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.stackmap);
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(stackmap_fd < 0))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
-	stack_amap_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "stack_amap");
+	stack_amap_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.stack_amap);
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(stack_amap_fd < 0))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
+	err = stacktrace_map__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
+		goto out;
 	/* give some time for bpf program run */
 	sleep(1);
 
 	/* disable stack trace collection */
-	key = 0;
-	val = 1;
-	bpf_map_update_elem(control_map_fd, &key, &val, 0);
+	skel->bss->control = 1;
 
 	/* for every element in stackid_hmap, we can find a corresponding one
 	 * in stackmap, and vice versa.
@@ -55,21 +41,19 @@ void test_stacktrace_map(void)
 	err = compare_map_keys(stackid_hmap_fd, stackmap_fd);
 	if (CHECK(err, "compare_map_keys stackid_hmap vs. stackmap",
 		  "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
 	err = compare_map_keys(stackmap_fd, stackid_hmap_fd);
 	if (CHECK(err, "compare_map_keys stackmap vs. stackid_hmap",
 		  "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
 	stack_trace_len = PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH * sizeof(__u64);
 	err = compare_stack_ips(stackmap_fd, stack_amap_fd, stack_trace_len);
 	if (CHECK(err, "compare_stack_ips stackmap vs. stack_amap",
 		  "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
-disable_pmu:
-	bpf_link__destroy(link);
-close_prog:
-	bpf_object__close(obj);
+out:
+	stacktrace_map__destroy(skel);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stacktrace_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stacktrace_map.c
similarity index 83%
rename from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stacktrace_map.c
rename to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stacktrace_map.c
index 47568007b66..9090d561312 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stacktrace_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stacktrace_map.c
@@ -8,13 +8,6 @@
 #define PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH         127
 #endif
 
-struct {
-	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
-	__uint(max_entries, 1);
-	__type(key, __u32);
-	__type(value, __u32);
-} control_map SEC(".maps");
-
 struct {
 	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
 	__uint(max_entries, 16384);
@@ -50,16 +43,16 @@ struct sched_switch_args {
 	int next_prio;
 };
 
+int control = 0;
 SEC("tracepoint/sched/sched_switch")
 int oncpu(struct sched_switch_args *ctx)
 {
 	__u32 max_len = PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH * sizeof(__u64);
-	__u32 key = 0, val = 0, *value_p;
+	__u32 key = 0, val = 0;
 	void *stack_p;
 
-	value_p = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&control_map, &key);
-	if (value_p && *value_p)
-		return 0; /* skip if non-zero *value_p */
+	if (control)
+		return 0;
 
 	/* The size of stackmap and stackid_hmap should be the same */
 	key = bpf_get_stackid(ctx, &stackmap, 0);
-- 
2.48.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-23 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-23 16:58 [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] bpf: Add lookup_and_delete_elem for BPF_MAP_STACK_TRACE Tao Chen
2025-09-23 16:58 ` Tao Chen [this message]
2025-09-23 16:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add stacktrace map lookup_and_delete_elem test case Tao Chen
2025-09-25 12:09   ` Daniel Borkmann
2025-09-25 13:12     ` Tao Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250923165849.1524622-2-chen.dylane@linux.dev \
    --to=chen.dylane@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®