From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
To: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix allocation failure in ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 07:36:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925020621.1268714-1-kartikey406@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Andreas,
Thank you for pointing out the fundamental issue with my approach. You're right that removing __GFP_NOFAIL creates a worse problem by potentially triggering filesystem errors.
I understand your suggestion about allowing the function to return errors so the caller can retry, but I need more specific guidance on the implementation approach.
Questions:
1. **Function signature change**: Should ext4_discard_preallocations() be changed from void to int to return error codes? This would require updating all 13+ callers I found.
2. **Caller modifications**: How should the various callers (ext4_truncate, ext4_clear_inode, ext4_release_file, etc.) handle allocation failures during memory pressure? Should they:
- Retry the operation later?
- Skip preallocation cleanup temporarily?
- Handle it differently based on the calling context?
3. **Memory pressure detection**: Is checking (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) the right approach to detect when we're in memory reclaim context?
4. **Scope of changes**: Would you prefer:
- A minimal fix that just handles the allocation failure gracefully?
- A more comprehensive rework of the error handling throughout the preallocation discard path?
I want to make sure I understand the preferred approach before submitting v2, especially since this affects multiple call sites throughout the ext4 codebase.
Best regards,
Deepanshu
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 2:06 Deepanshu Kartikey [this message]
2025-09-26 19:17 ` Andreas Dilger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-27 0:19 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-09-27 0:18 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-09-27 3:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-09-24 1:16 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-09-24 23:33 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925020621.1268714-1-kartikey406@gmail.com \
--to=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®