From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>
Cc: jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
ira.weiny@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
shiju.jose@huawei.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] cxl/port: Avoid missing port component registers setup
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 17:50:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250930005053.2jme7stunhrmp3om@offworld> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250928101433.424778-1-ming.li@zohomail.com>
On Sun, 28 Sep 2025, Li Ming wrote:
>port->nr_dports is used to represent how many dports added to the cxl
>port, it will increase in add_dport() when a new dport is being added to
>the cxl port, but it will not be reduced when a dport is removed from
>the cxl port.
>
>Currently, when the first dport is added to a cxl port, it will trigger
>component registers setup on the cxl port, the implementation is using
>port->nr_dports to confirm if the dport is the first dport.
>
>A corner case here is that adding dport could fail after port->nr_dports
>updating and before checking port->nr_dports for component registers
>setup. If the failure happens during the first dport attaching, it will
>cause that CXL subsystem has not chance to execute component registers
>setup for the cxl port. the failure flow like below:
>
>port->nr_dports = 0
>dport 1 adding to the port:
> add_dport() # port->nr_dports: 1
> failed on devm_add_action_or_reset() or sysfs_create_link()
> return error # port->nr_dports: 1
>dport 2 adding to the port:
> add_dport() # port->nr_dports: 2
> no failure
> skip component registers setup because of port->nr_dports is 2
>
>The solution here is that moving component registers setup closer to
>add_dport(), so if add_dport() is executed correctly for the first
>dport, component registers setup on the port will be executed
>immediately after that.
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-28 10:14 Li Ming
2025-09-29 16:53 ` Dave Jiang
2025-09-30 0:46 ` Li Ming
2025-09-30 0:50 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250930005053.2jme7stunhrmp3om@offworld \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®