verifier: should we handle mark_chain_precision return value properly in loop_flag_is_zero?

[Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>]

Hi folks,
While going through the verifier code, I noticed that the integer return value of mark_chain_precision() is ignored within loop_flag_is_zero().

static bool loop_flag_is_zero(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
    struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
    struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &regs[BPF_REG_4];
    bool reg_is_null = register_is_null(reg);

    if (reg_is_null)
        mark_chain_precision(env, BPF_REG_4);

    return reg_is_null;
}

My question is:
Is this behavior intentional (i.e., errors from mark_chain_precision() are safe to ignore here)?
Or should loop_flag_is_zero() propagate the error to update_loop_inline_state() and from there to check_helper_call() function?
I’d appreciate any clarification or suggestions. Apologies if this kind of question isn’t appropriate for the mailing list, I wanted to clarify the intended semantics before attempting a fix.

Thanks,
Suchit Karunakaran