From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B212036E9; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 23:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759878754; cv=none; b=nr60TvwZRA/zsg4LjZcOq7c0rV+8tyPuMR3eHJ44s5NwIMYGGN8GuJ+axEAnjfx2WyOxSLUqo4HHIby7Su30sIqrOUHeLV8PT1PiaLrgbt4fWObRZ66QjXVWU77AkmUPFt7sjdaXsxjU3j7n7ab4CX2vrQ6t/ec1ZiOBXVDfjyE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759878754; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L0OR/eEgE1BGptpL89EyN6LrGzo0DI3u5c2FvV3B8R4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jPTXImsxi0aAqPInh3gyolnkYS5+p/uGljJ68y4/geP3h/DnxvEZH5AjMk9UkkdNuAdHPOQwGk8bA5MhOUbBcDOyNYiO/D3Lhw9pCTJc83c8qpKH+6hbJfgOr01HlEiUuW0eTbxHnkhfVNBtf5FW3t/5kOpzUJf5C/8QSNGRktc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=216.40.44.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=goodmis.org Received: from omf18.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0801B89BC; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 23:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [HIDDEN] (Authenticated sender: rostedt@goodmis.org) by omf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 035DD34; Tue, 7 Oct 2025 23:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 19:14:15 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" Cc: Thorsten Blum , Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: probes: Replace strcpy() with memcpy() in __trace_probe_log_err() Message-ID: <20251007191415.01f9005e@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20250909085308.15a7f4379b5d324051bbd383@kernel.org> References: <20250820214717.778243-3-thorsten.blum@linux.dev> <20250825160540.9a5272a8a93a789eb36a7098@kernel.org> <635528D7-9B5F-4B7C-9568-87375BA866C3@linux.dev> <20250909085308.15a7f4379b5d324051bbd383@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.20.0git84 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Stat-Signature: u6ai4tgjtg8rgtdjtykmh8q3ph8ymy4z X-Rspamd-Server: rspamout01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 035DD34 X-Session-Marker: 726F737465647440676F6F646D69732E6F7267 X-Session-ID: U2FsdGVkX1+Ff9b1DNCLepTkZDt5aQMiGOVgvqB0+GY= X-HE-Tag: 1759878742-952239 X-HE-Meta: U2FsdGVkX1+aONDPtlaQVv3ANLbOF2BQ27Z0Ll+Qvnp74koU4CrrC28SQzKRb4Kj2hJDb/vsUwOAfzR0q/Zapb8QE1UuxBuLdbbqEmT/oakUgvbKjgTwcM+pOEk0/aKeLhY4JnZitjCTJ4z+6E04TL6V+uJY+MpIQDwFbTNEXb9PfvuXaLNxLm8zKTw4bjWXNX/PdDm6ntP5EQlrOc6m3TtldTFzvuyqow1lbu9klgyinQwX6AuMFVh+RVd9KeTmQFfMC8sNQX04nbx+Ncf3BnGEBrr49WYidYDHcu1E3J5ynpI1jzAyQYzmxD3NL2vvWvLXTNaHydgeo7xc3AZ2yTpEqsvrapo5wC+8C9k2egAcwWgpfAcx+g== On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 08:53:08 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > On Mon, 8 Sep 2025 12:13:23 +0200 > Thorsten Blum wrote: > > > Hi Masami, > > > > On 25. Aug 2025, at 09:05, Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 23:47:18 +0200 > > > Thorsten Blum wrote: > > > > > >> strcpy() is deprecated; use memcpy() instead. > > >> > > >> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88 > > >> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum > > > > > > OK, looks good to me. > > > > Did you forget to add a Reviewed-by: tag and/or to add it to your tree? > > Thanks for ping me. No problem, I will add my Signed-by when > picking this to probes/for-next. > Since I will be responsible for applying this patch and sending > it to Linus, this includes the "Reviewed-by" as well. > Was this ever sent to Linus? -- Steve