From: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>
To: heming.zhao@suse.com, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com,
mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org
Cc: ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+6fdd8fa3380730a4b22c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: fix stale extent map cache during COW operations
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 13:12:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251011074226.821546-1-kartikey406@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Heming,
Thank you for the detailed analysis and feedback.
I appreciate your review. However, I'm trying to understand your explanation
better. You mentioned that step 5 (write with zeros) cleans the file data
and causes the refcount flag mismatch.
Looking at the C reproducer, I see:
- Step 7: copy_file_range() creates reflinked extent (flags=0x2)
- Step 8: ioctl(fd, 0x40406f06, ...) which is FITRIM
- Step 9: write() triggers the BUG_ON
In my analysis, step 8 (FITRIM) calls ocfs2_move_extents() ->
__ocfs2_move_extents_range() -> ocfs2_move_extent() -> __ocfs2_move_extent().
Inside __ocfs2_move_extent() at line 50, I found:
replace_rec.e_flags = ext_flags & ~OCFS2_EXT_REFCOUNTED;
This explicitly clears the OCFS2_EXT_REFCOUNTED flag when writing to disk,
but the extent cache is not invalidated afterward.
Could you help me understand:
1. How does the write operation in step 5 clear the refcount flag on disk?
2. Are you suggesting there might be two separate bugs - one in the FITRIM
path (which v2 fixes) and another in a different path (which v1 would fix)?
My v2 patch has been merged into linux-next. If you believe v1 addresses a
different bug scenario, I'm happy to submit it as an additional patch.
Thanks for your time and expertise!
Best regards,
Deepanshu
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-11 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-11 7:42 Deepanshu Kartikey [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-10-11 8:32 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-11 12:27 ` Heming Zhao
2025-10-09 14:29 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-11 4:50 ` Heming Zhao
2025-10-08 4:23 Deepanshu Kartikey
2025-10-09 9:14 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251011074226.821546-1-kartikey406@gmail.com \
--to=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=heming.zhao@suse.com \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzbot+6fdd8fa3380730a4b22c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®