From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/23] KVM: selftests: Pass the root GPA into virt_get_pte()
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 07:47:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251021074736.1324328-14-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021074736.1324328-1-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Instead of hardcoding the root check against vm->pgd, pass the root_gpa
into virt_get_pte(). There's a subtle change here, instead of checking
that the parent pointer has the address of vm->pgd, check if the value
pointed at by the parent pointer is the root_gpa. No change in behavior
expected, but this will be required for following changes that
generalize __virt_pg_map() to other MMUs.
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
index 8a838f208abe4..92a2b5aefd880 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/processor.c
@@ -179,15 +179,15 @@ const struct pte_masks x86_pte_masks = {
.nx = BIT_ULL(63),
};
-static void *virt_get_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t *parent_pte,
- uint64_t vaddr, int level,
+static void *virt_get_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t root_gpa,
+ uint64_t *parent_pte, uint64_t vaddr, int level,
const struct pte_masks *masks)
{
uint64_t pt_gpa = PTE_GET_PA(*parent_pte);
uint64_t *page_table = addr_gpa2hva(vm, pt_gpa);
int index = (vaddr >> PG_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & 0x1ffu;
- TEST_ASSERT((*parent_pte & masks->present) || parent_pte == &vm->pgd,
+ TEST_ASSERT((*parent_pte == root_gpa) || (*parent_pte & masks->present),
"Parent PTE (level %d) not PRESENT for gva: 0x%08lx",
level + 1, vaddr);
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void *virt_get_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t *parent_pte,
}
static uint64_t *virt_create_upper_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm,
+ vm_paddr_t root_gpa,
uint64_t *parent_pte,
uint64_t vaddr,
uint64_t paddr,
@@ -202,7 +203,8 @@ static uint64_t *virt_create_upper_pte(struct kvm_vm *vm,
int target_level,
const struct pte_masks *masks)
{
- uint64_t *pte = virt_get_pte(vm, parent_pte, vaddr, current_level, masks);
+ uint64_t *pte = virt_get_pte(vm, root_gpa, parent_pte,
+ vaddr, current_level, masks);
paddr = vm_untag_gpa(vm, paddr);
@@ -259,13 +261,14 @@ void __virt_pg_map(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint64_t vaddr, uint64_t paddr,
* early if a hugepage was created.
*/
for (current_level = vm->pgtable_levels; current_level > PG_LEVEL_4K; current_level--) {
- pte = virt_create_upper_pte(vm, pte, vaddr, paddr, current_level, level, masks);
+ pte = virt_create_upper_pte(vm, vm->pgd, pte, vaddr, paddr,
+ current_level, level, masks);
if (*pte & masks->large)
return;
}
/* Fill in page table entry. */
- pte = virt_get_pte(vm, pte, vaddr, PG_LEVEL_4K, masks);
+ pte = virt_get_pte(vm, vm->pgd, pte, vaddr, PG_LEVEL_4K, masks);
TEST_ASSERT(!(*pte & masks->present),
"PTE already present for 4k page at vaddr: 0x%lx", vaddr);
*pte = masks->present | masks->writeable | (paddr & PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK);
@@ -348,7 +351,7 @@ static uint64_t *__vm_get_page_table_entry(struct kvm_vm *vm,
"Canonical check failed. The virtual address is invalid.");
for (current_level = vm->pgtable_levels; current_level >= PG_LEVEL_4K; current_level--) {
- pte = virt_get_pte(vm, pte, vaddr, current_level, masks);
+ pte = virt_get_pte(vm, vm->pgd, pte, vaddr, current_level, masks);
if (vm_is_target_pte(pte, level, current_level, masks))
return pte;
}
--
2.51.0.869.ge66316f041-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-21 7:47 [PATCH v2 00/23] Extend test coverage for nested SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 01/23] KVM: selftests: Minor improvements to asserts in test_vmx_nested_state() Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-20 23:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-20 23:46 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 02/23] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_set_nested_state_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-20 23:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 03/23] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_close_while_nested_test " Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-20 23:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 04/23] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_nested_tsc_scaling_test " Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-20 23:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 05/23] KVM: selftests: Move nested invalid CR3 check to its own test Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-20 23:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 06/23] KVM: selftests: Extend nested_invalid_cr3_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 07/23] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_tsc_adjust_test " Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 08/23] KVM: selftests: Stop hardcoding PAGE_SIZE in x86 selftests Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 09/23] KVM: selftests: Remove the unused argument to prepare_eptp() Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 10/23] KVM: selftests: Stop using __virt_pg_map() directly in tests Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 11/23] KVM: selftests: Make sure vm->vpages_mapped is always up-to-date Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 12/23] KVM: selftests: Parameterize the PTE bitmasks for virt mapping functions Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-21 0:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-21 0:18 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 14/23] KVM: selftests: Pass the root GPA into __virt_pg_map() Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 15/23] KVM: selftests: Stop setting AD bits on nested EPTs on creation Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 16/23] KVM: selftests: Use __virt_pg_map() for nested EPTs Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 17/23] KVM: selftests: Kill eptPageTablePointer Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 18/23] KVM: selftests: Generalize nested mapping functions Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-21 0:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-21 0:20 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 19/23] KVM: selftests: Move nested MMU mapping functions outside of vmx.c Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 20/23] KVM: selftests: Stop passing a memslot to nested_map_memslot() Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 21/23] KVM: selftests: Allow kvm_cpu_has_ept() to be called on AMD CPUs Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 22/23] KVM: selftests: Set the user bit on nested MMU PTEs Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-21 7:47 ` [PATCH v2 23/23] KVM: selftests: Extend vmx_dirty_log_test to cover SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-10-29 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/23] Extend test coverage for nested SVM Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-18 22:25 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-18 23:00 ` Jim Mattson
2025-11-18 23:22 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-18 23:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-19 0:01 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-19 0:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-20 23:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-20 23:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-20 23:32 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-20 23:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-21 0:05 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-21 0:24 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-11-21 0:30 ` Yosry Ahmed
2025-11-21 18:55 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251021074736.1324328-14-yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--to=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®