From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D90A3AC1C for ; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761184326; cv=none; b=WGReHmwQJwxUe8W4iGljkDjUHZ6rRfVnFPXuzFaX7ofxMZj8Tj0LhMajOVCV8PpgvSki7BTbrZaHzD3qG52/roxnJnf3NPDvjjqypLW/qcuhzO4wEb9Rz8qijepfSUoRmMdk5jtL7DWi+uYKywE65h5wyx6mkVrqemwcfE0fXB0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761184326; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4njMwdzTkvdbhUJLwwFwLq6fjC7rbLkG1HPGx1CUYjE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=NZdVdT54MjwkTUteaei8GAmqzIsxN79tcK20cliZDNNHOqPq9Wjnk1vi0ZvWB45r15d8BNoh6q+8XnBZllJ2o7qcl0za3jkpSP4iH5l97iNL4+YhHYlcK3N736FX0Ec9eNAFBlD9ZxgAmi4ZZJSWgiwEiLa/SBPTcSPzoe9OdW0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=GJBAT0UO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GJBAT0UO" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1761184324; x=1792720324; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=4njMwdzTkvdbhUJLwwFwLq6fjC7rbLkG1HPGx1CUYjE=; b=GJBAT0UOcFbHiXdf5EYYKZ7Aq/O8uhUXCzU6fGPwsB3eGLFMI+Oq2Axu DuhHayqAvZgY3K6CJ3usT6Af+ku6DonkqWiTCq79zDPJchtrEIVIiI4uG hrj5r5tyKOMcwyClnEySOiyTFnBZr3vlfjR9MNh5igfl9BE1UYBSiA+g7 6qHWPScNi6mjjmrImdUzDq2aChPw0soUxRiVc6CCIoNnrCTBqrj34CVST ZzZYxc9OEpaHRf7g18dM/YcwSXmptueeY1c5m/NgKVhbpLWNTdbMA2lFv JIyx9H0aRa6GIwCCGlp/hkSehSxHtey45ZdDFq8Wp4YGdWF2mkC5XUjmx A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XnJi/E/GTjSjV1MKL32JbQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4ZAJdm8nQHGFR8+GBDiwVA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11586"; a="63439093" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,248,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="63439093" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2025 18:52:03 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: SpZbgr7gS3WA+JPfqKSCyQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HapnDRkpSaCFQvg1UIao5w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,248,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="184508165" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 66d7546c76b2) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2025 18:51:58 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 66d7546c76b2 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vBkUe-000CuJ-1D; Thu, 23 Oct 2025 01:51:56 +0000 Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 09:51:44 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry) is wrong, expected 3" Message-ID: <202510230913.RgbAGc3c-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Darrick, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: dd72c8fcf6d35de5d6d976f20dc1ae84ce7af08b commit: 13877bc79d81354c53e91f3c86ac0f7bafe3ba7b xfs: port ondisk structure checks from xfs/122 to the kernel date: 12 months ago config: arm-randconfig-004-20251023 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251023/202510230913.RgbAGc3c-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251023/202510230913.RgbAGc3c-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510230913.RgbAGc3c-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/container_of.h:5, from include/linux/list.h:5, from include/linux/semaphore.h:11, from fs/xfs/xfs_linux.h:24, from fs/xfs/xfs.h:26, from fs/xfs/xfs_super.c:7: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h: In function 'xfs_check_ondisk_structs': >> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry) is wrong, expected 3" #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert' #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:10:2: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert' static_assert(sizeof(structname) == (size), \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:133:2: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE' XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_attr_sf_entry, 3); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: static assertion failed: "XFS: sizeof(struct xfs_dir2_data_unused) is wrong, expected 6" #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert' #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:10:2: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert' static_assert(sizeof(structname) == (size), \ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_ondisk.h:136:2: note: in expansion of macro 'XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE' XFS_CHECK_STRUCT_SIZE(struct xfs_dir2_data_unused, 6); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +78 include/linux/build_bug.h bc6245e5efd70c Ian Abbott 2017-07-10 60 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 61 /** 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 62 * static_assert - check integer constant expression at build time 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 63 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 64 * static_assert() is a wrapper for the C11 _Static_assert, with a 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 65 * little macro magic to make the message optional (defaulting to the 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 66 * stringification of the tested expression). 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 67 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 68 * Contrary to BUILD_BUG_ON(), static_assert() can be used at global 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 69 * scope, but requires the expression to be an integer constant 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 70 * expression (i.e., it is not enough that __builtin_constant_p() is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 71 * true for expr). 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 72 * 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 73 * Also note that BUILD_BUG_ON() fails the build if the condition is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 74 * true, while static_assert() fails the build if the expression is 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 75 * false. 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 76 */ 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 77 #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr) 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 @78 #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg) 6bab69c65013be Rasmus Villemoes 2019-03-07 79 07a368b3f55a79 Maxim Levitsky 2022-10-25 80 :::::: The code at line 78 was first introduced by commit :::::: 6bab69c65013bed5fce9f101a64a84d0385b3946 build_bug.h: add wrapper for _Static_assert :::::: TO: Rasmus Villemoes :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki