From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Maciej Falkowski <maciej.falkowski@linux.intel.com>,
Karol Wachowski <karol.wachowski@linux.intel.com>,
Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] accel/ivpu: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:52:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251024095205.123123-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024095205.123123-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
system_unbound_wq should be the default workqueue so as not to enforce
locality constraints for random work whenever it's not required.
Adding system_dfl_wq to encourage its use when unbound work should be used.
The old system_unbound_wq will be kept for a few release cycles.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
index 475ddc94f1cf..ffa2ba7cafe2 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ void ivpu_pm_trigger_recovery(struct ivpu_device *vdev, const char *reason)
if (atomic_cmpxchg(&vdev->pm->reset_pending, 0, 1) == 0) {
ivpu_hw_diagnose_failure(vdev);
ivpu_hw_irq_disable(vdev); /* Disable IRQ early to protect from IRQ storm */
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &vdev->pm->recovery_work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &vdev->pm->recovery_work);
}
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-24 9:52 [PATCH 0/2] replace system_unbound_wq and system_wq with the new wqs Marco Crivellari
2025-10-24 9:52 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-10-24 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] accel/ivpu: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-10-24 10:48 ` Karol Wachowski
2025-10-24 12:58 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251024095205.123123-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=karol.wachowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.falkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ogabbay@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®