From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 787A31494D9 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 13:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761313559; cv=none; b=p9KWGEkD6Pwv2h8yZg6YVw+Bqzg58l4egIc7haYLT41Z5j6f+XC4xocwy2y5ALlXm6aY+7JxzY6rhFPYsujkqtfXt1uZD+TGi6afWeC6IhCuOOKZyZ4FfJG82vz+2NttIsD4A3h6PYeHXXXnhiZUC04HdVAYsvAdO3YGPmwvCl8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761313559; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RmQnKBV1obuzYCAqSs/q2r0kPrj4WpnuWojvv6eiba0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=vDhfMqVwhAD8SqKZQey4uxXtga77cvAYUieaEgWvDBxe9m5FG2wl36G0ZlEZnkkCKooHG/LuxtRQTepq5AJ9Bs3ImuoDA/yKTeNin6YCTSGTNC4CH4EbSLONlSPfAzzrovVx3nqA7XH7eSb3pR5he6p6MvVANZL09RMxrbvEYxs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=AcrnhscE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="AcrnhscE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=NpkZbdmoOd1H6RDfh/V7uaNkAdx3zJ05aEWxUS3F6oI=; b=AcrnhscEKlMk/75NeeA5Yn9WkV FY6i/BR8DIPZtHHhOFn/D8VFioFk/Vzo5odFFEfEDUu6vFU+yq8R9jO+NTH+nkngP0D1omWumhpXY IvNKw8v+OeMX9THzBQDnrvxkhklj3r5CYBhAWCvd2D7A7SCkIwAJ0WzUiLsxHGqyqld5GnNQQ4nos uzMF9V0XY2131cs0r49K/kDsV9kwh2pAmkyBHInFW0g8hBghlQNAcS6NCvC+vgsMkC6bmxuf33D2F eVWfJNiFe5WCr5PPrJgc+cbjN+Fp14Ezg8CTj14R0g8gG4f2rR8jP6rilwejzM6ZXdtbulq/fwPv8 RL6KZ6QA==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vCHFR-00000002J2C-1phi; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 12:50:25 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2B6D300323; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 15:45:50 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Jens Remus , jpoimboe@kernel.org, rostedt@kernel.org, Indu Bhagat , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] unwind: Implement compat fp unwind Message-ID: <20251024134550.GU4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20250924075948.579302904@infradead.org> <20250924080119.613695709@infradead.org> <20251020103940.GP3419281@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20251020104807.GS1386988@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20251022112344.113da927@gandalf.local.home> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251022112344.113da927@gandalf.local.home> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 11:23:44AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 12:48:07 +0200 > Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 12:39:40PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > Yes, this should do nicely. I've made the changes, I'll do a test build > > > and then push out to the robots. > > > > Ok, this now lives here: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git unwind/cleanup > > > > Suppose this all comes back clean from the robots, where shall I merge > > it? tip/perf/core, tip/x86/core ? > > I've been basing all my perf work off of tip/perf/core, so perhaps use that branch? Right, I'll move the pile over to queue/perf/core and once blessed by the robots shove it into -tip.