Re: [PATCH 11/12] unwind: Implement compat fp unwind

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 04:10:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 02:31:40PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:59:59 +0200
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > @@ -100,6 +115,7 @@ static int unwind_user_start(struct unwi
> > >  	state->ip = instruction_pointer(regs);
> > >  	state->sp = user_stack_pointer(regs);
> > >  	state->fp = frame_pointer(regs);
> > > +	state->ws = compat_user_mode(regs) ? sizeof(int) : sizeof(long);
> > 
> > compat_user_mode() is an architecture function (only defined in arm64 and now x86).
> > 
> > s390 doesn't implement it and regs can't be used to tell if it's compat or
> > not (although Jens tells me the task_struct can).
> 
> I've made this:
> 
> 	state->ws = unwind_user_word_size(regs);

Ooh, how about I do:

	if (!state->ws) {
		state->done = true;
		return -EINVAL; // nobody cares about this return value
	}

> 
> And then every arch will need to implement this. The x86 implementations
> is:
> 
> static inline int unwind_user_word_size(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
	if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
		return 0;
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>        if (!user_64bit_mode(regs))
>                return sizeof(int);
> #endif
>        return sizeof(long);
> }

Then we flat out refuse to unwind VM86, which is slightly different from
the current code (which would still record regs->ip), but meh.