mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
Cc: "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@android.com>,
	"Todd Kjos" <tkjos@android.com>,
	"Martijn Coenen" <maco@android.com>,
	"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] rust_binder: move BC_FREE_BUFFER drop inside if statement
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:50:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251029-binder-bcfreebuf-option-v1-1-4d282be0439f@google.com> (raw)

When looking at flamegraphs, there is a pretty large entry for the
function call drop_in_place::<Option<Allocation>> which in turn calls
drop_in_place::<Allocation>. Combined with the looper_need_return
condition, this means that the generated code looks like this:

	if let Some(buffer) = buffer {
	    if buffer.looper_need_return_on_free() {
	        self.inner.lock().looper_need_return = true;
	    }
	}
	drop_in_place::<Option<Allocation>>() { // not inlined
	    if let Some(buffer) = buffer {
	    	drop_in_place::<Allocation>(buffer);
	    }
	}

This kind of situation where you check X and then check X again is
normally optimized into a single condition, but in this case due to the
non-inlined function call to drop_in_place::<Option<Allocation>>, that
optimization does not happen.

Furthermore, the drop_in_place::<Allocation> call is only two-thirds of
the drop_in_place::<Option<Allocation>> call in the flamegraph. This
indicates that this double condition is not performing well. Also, last
time I looked at Binder perf, I remember finding that the destructor of
Allocation was involved with many branch mispredictions.

Thus, change this code to look like this:

	if let Some(buffer) = buffer {
	    if buffer.looper_need_return_on_free() {
	        self.inner.lock().looper_need_return = true;
	    }
	    drop_in_place::<Allocation>(buffer);
	}

by dropping the Allocation directly. Flamegraphs confirm that the
drop_in_place::<Option<Allocation>> call disappears from this change.

Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
---
 drivers/android/binder/thread.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder/thread.rs b/drivers/android/binder/thread.rs
index 7e34ccd394f8049bab88562ffb4601739aea670a..1a8e6fdc0dc42369ee078e720aa02b2554fb7332 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder/thread.rs
+++ b/drivers/android/binder/thread.rs
@@ -1323,12 +1323,12 @@ fn write(self: &Arc<Self>, req: &mut BinderWriteRead) -> Result {
                 }
                 BC_FREE_BUFFER => {
                     let buffer = self.process.buffer_get(reader.read()?);
-                    if let Some(buffer) = &buffer {
+                    if let Some(buffer) = buffer {
                         if buffer.looper_need_return_on_free() {
                             self.inner.lock().looper_need_return = true;
                         }
+                        drop(buffer);
                     }
-                    drop(buffer);
                 }
                 BC_INCREFS => {
                     self.process

---
base-commit: 211ddde0823f1442e4ad052a2f30f050145ccada
change-id: 20251029-binder-bcfreebuf-option-35276027ce11

Best regards,
-- 
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>


             reply	other threads:[~2025-10-29 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-29 11:50 Alice Ryhl [this message]
2025-11-07 22:02 ` Carlos Llamas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251029-binder-bcfreebuf-option-v1-1-4d282be0439f@google.com \
    --to=aliceryhl@google.com \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maco@android.com \
    --cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tkjos@android.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®