From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: scan: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:47:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251030154739.262582-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251030154739.262582-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
system_unbound_wq should be the default workqueue so as not to enforce
locality constraints for random work whenever it's not required.
Adding system_dfl_wq to encourage its use when unbound work should be used.
The old system_unbound_wq will be kept for a few release cycles.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index ef16d58b2949..e0c0b5a50d26 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -2397,7 +2397,7 @@ static bool acpi_scan_clear_dep_queue(struct acpi_device *adev)
* initial enumeration of devices is complete, put it into the unbound
* workqueue.
*/
- queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &cdw->work);
+ queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &cdw->work);
return true;
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-30 15:47 [PATCH 0/5] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 15:47 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-10-30 15:47 ` [PATCH 2/5] ACPI: OSL: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 15:47 ` [PATCH 3/5] ACPI: EC: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 15:47 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: OSL: " Marco Crivellari
2025-10-30 15:47 ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI: thermal: " Marco Crivellari
2025-11-03 17:47 ` [PATCH 0/5] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-11-04 8:58 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251030154739.262582-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®