From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Guan-Chun Wu <409411716@gms.tku.edu.tw>
Cc: ebiggers@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
xiubli@redhat.com, idryomov@gmail.com, kbusch@kernel.org,
axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
visitorckw@gmail.com, home7438072@gmail.com,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] lib/base64: add generic encoder/decoder, migrate users
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 21:09:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251031210947.1d2b028da88ef526aebd890d@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029101725.541758-1-409411716@gms.tku.edu.tw>
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 18:17:25 +0800 Guan-Chun Wu <409411716@gms.tku.edu.tw> wrote:
> This series introduces a generic Base64 encoder/decoder to the kernel
> library, eliminating duplicated implementations and delivering significant
> performance improvements.
>
> The Base64 API has been extended to support multiple variants (Standard,
> URL-safe, and IMAP) as defined in RFC 4648 and RFC 3501. The API now takes
> a variant parameter and an option to control padding. As part of this
> series, users are migrated to the new interface while preserving their
> specific formats: fscrypt now uses BASE64_URLSAFE, Ceph uses BASE64_IMAP,
> and NVMe is updated to BASE64_STD.
>
> On the encoder side, the implementation processes input in 3-byte blocks,
> mapping 24 bits directly to 4 output symbols. This avoids bit-by-bit
> streaming and reduces loop overhead, achieving about a 2.7x speedup compared
> to previous implementations.
>
> On the decoder side, replace strchr() lookups with per-variant reverse tables
> and process input in 4-character groups. Each group is mapped to numeric values
> and combined into 3 bytes. Padded and unpadded forms are validated explicitly,
> rejecting invalid '=' usage and enforcing tail rules.
Looks like wonderful work, thanks. And it's good to gain a selftest
for this code.
> This improves throughput by ~43-52x.
Well that isn't a thing we see every day.
: Decode:
: 64B ~1530ns -> ~80ns (~19.1x)
: 1KB ~27726ns -> ~1239ns (~22.4x)
: Encode:
: 64B ~90ns -> ~32ns (~2.8x)
: 1KB ~1332ns -> ~510ns (~2.6x)
:
: Decode:
: 64B ~1530ns -> ~35ns (~43.7x)
: 1KB ~27726ns -> ~530ns (~52.3x)
: This change also improves performance: encoding is about 2.7x faster and
: decoding achieves 43-52x speedups compared to the previous implementation.
: This change also improves performance: encoding is about 2.7x faster and
: decoding achieves 43-52x speedups compared to the previous local
: implementation.
Do any of these callers spend a sufficient amount of time in this
encoder/decoder for the above improvements to be observable/useful?
I'll add the series to mm.git's mm-nonmm-unstable branch to give it
linux-next exposure. I ask the NVMe, ceph and fscrypt teams to check
the code and give it a test in the next few weeks, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-01 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 10:17 Guan-Chun Wu
2025-10-29 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] lib/base64: Add support for multiple variants Guan-Chun Wu
2025-10-29 10:20 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] lib/base64: Optimize base64_decode() with reverse lookup tables Guan-Chun Wu
2025-10-29 10:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] lib/base64: rework encode/decode for speed and stricter validation Guan-Chun Wu
2025-10-29 10:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] lib: add KUnit tests for base64 encoding/decoding Guan-Chun Wu
2025-10-29 10:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] fscrypt: replace local base64url helpers with lib/base64 Guan-Chun Wu
2025-10-29 10:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] ceph: replace local base64 " Guan-Chun Wu
2025-11-01 4:09 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2025-11-03 10:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] lib/base64: add generic encoder/decoder, migrate users Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 11:07 ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2025-11-03 13:22 ` David Laight
2025-11-03 14:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 18:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 19:29 ` David Laight
2025-11-03 19:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-03 22:32 ` David Laight
2025-11-04 8:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-04 1:27 ` Andrew Morton
2025-11-04 8:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-04 9:03 ` David Laight
2025-11-04 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-05 9:48 ` David Laight
2025-11-05 14:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-11-05 14:38 ` David Laight
2025-11-09 12:36 ` Guan-Chun Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251031210947.1d2b028da88ef526aebd890d@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=409411716@gms.tku.edu.tw \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=home7438072@gmail.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=visitorckw@gmail.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome