Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] tools/nolibc: add the more portable inttypes.h

[Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>]

On Sun, Nov 02, 2025 at 12:04:01PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> On 2025-11-02 11:46:09+0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > It's often recommended to only use inttypes.h instead of stdint.h for
> > portability reasons since the former is always present when the latter
> > is present, but not conversely, and the former includes the latter. Due
> > to this some simple programs fail to build when including inttypes.h.
> > Let's add one that simply includes stdint.h to better support these
> > programs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
> > ---
> >  tools/include/nolibc/Makefile   | 1 +
> >  tools/include/nolibc/inttypes.h | 8 ++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/include/nolibc/inttypes.h
> 
> I think this should also interact with the big nolibc.h.
> Both being included from it and including it itself, to follow the
> generally used pattern.
> 

You mean you'd prefer "include nolibc.h" from inttypes and
"include inttypes" from nolibc, that's it ?

Willy