From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>,
Naresh Gottumukkala <nareshgottumukkala83@gmail.com>,
Paul Ely <paul.ely@broadcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] nvmet-fc: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 12:25:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251104112535.139450-4-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251104112535.139450-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.
This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.
This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request alloc_workqueue()
to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified.
This patch continues the effort to refactor worqueue APIs, which has begun
with the change introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU.
Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
become the implicit default.
Cc: Justin Tee <justin.tee@broadcom.com>
Cc: Naresh Gottumukkala <nareshgottumukkala83@gmail.com>
CC: Paul Ely <paul.ely@broadcom.com>
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
drivers/nvme/target/fc.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
index 7d84527d5a43..ac730f2e6ea1 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
@@ -795,9 +795,9 @@ nvmet_fc_alloc_target_queue(struct nvmet_fc_tgt_assoc *assoc,
if (!queue)
return NULL;
- queue->work_q = alloc_workqueue("ntfc%d.%d.%d", 0, 0,
- assoc->tgtport->fc_target_port.port_num,
- assoc->a_id, qid);
+ queue->work_q = alloc_workqueue("ntfc%d.%d.%d", WQ_PERCPU, 0,
+ assoc->tgtport->fc_target_port.port_num,
+ assoc->a_id, qid);
if (!queue->work_q)
goto out_free_queue;
--
2.51.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-04 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 11:25 [PATCH 0/3] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-11-04 11:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvmet: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-11-04 11:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2025-11-04 11:25 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-11-04 22:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvmet-fc: " Justin Tee
2026-01-13 9:09 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251104112535.139450-4-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=justin.tee@broadcom.com \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nareshgottumukkala83@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.ely@broadcom.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®