From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: qcomm-labibb: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 17:20:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251105162024.314040-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
This patch continues the effort to refactor worqueue APIs, which has begun
with the change introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
Replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq, keeping the old behavior.
The old wq (system_wq) will be kept for a few release cycles.
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
index ba3f9391565f..ad65d264cfe0 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/qcom-labibb-regulator.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static void qcom_labibb_ocp_recovery_worker(struct work_struct *work)
return;
reschedule:
- mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &vreg->ocp_recovery_work,
+ mod_delayed_work(system_percpu_wq, &vreg->ocp_recovery_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(OCP_RECOVERY_INTERVAL_MS));
}
@@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static void qcom_labibb_sc_recovery_worker(struct work_struct *work)
* taking action is not truly urgent anymore.
*/
vreg->sc_count++;
- mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &vreg->sc_recovery_work,
+ mod_delayed_work(system_percpu_wq, &vreg->sc_recovery_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(SC_RECOVERY_INTERVAL_MS));
}
--
2.51.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-05 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-05 16:20 Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-11-05 16:26 ` Mark Brown
2025-11-05 16:57 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251105162024.314040-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®