From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com (mail-wm1-f54.google.com [209.85.128.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4A5286413 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 15:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762443051; cv=none; b=GvyQ5L9moB48A9QhTTihHvSZDCsdz/UNCP6oWYJVGXkJxvCu50hca3SNvN5FW41Jwg5/YtLNEu6tkob6ya7q0tCH1fe+ADFLUL0NfG11LXukwdud4PYxdUf3iV7AhFpNSX/2tz2/9aTK6g4Ycrp27y/KGfkHIx1XkBQkmcpnRIk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762443051; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PO6dHZiI3iUO2Fk7I3+uF0XWuA9JROkT9V8qD1fjBlc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ZEi5OceYfm3REyh69kRIq8PWJk7cg3KqcXru6P+jfgT+RzweFg0cRRGUVJZ3R9DrUHIpX5fTj05hXOtJwDCnanATzYhXJ/rYQGtgt3aG3/oPJrcT1/GqywVEhEmiftmbe9Grdu+V0gKAjWe+TDQLZ3ig4irP+gP/cMwPd7DgEfo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=d38jJJ65; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.54 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="d38jJJ65" Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-477563cb70aso897025e9.1 for ; Thu, 06 Nov 2025 07:30:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1762443045; x=1763047845; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ch2Eax89RB20s4DR1TXaJcyV6BYdXbU+N7gMw+0YTgc=; b=d38jJJ65XfUZdbhYLC9GKBdE/9XFv5c35O4LHiRgQpEqNpYYqW4WdfJKraLdHKxNxs pGVSVAS1cQng5aqa/tBEuM1lGIu5h4DWXW11sPsXwU4dVq7b7FIDK1Ur+DcKokjcxigl y5cCHh9QtiW6dbIsAT4iWYSe6AUrTefSuqndyRQWu9Xbd+dGVRtR0XYHEB5J6+2tPbzx Coypkc4Sab6SkkGufd1CXk8gUV0EOr1b5KUPFXDcAxteg/q76OPeqFBj1oFDkXDVKkdb 3Unkd0PI9DPl6FpPkLLACKdprY6BexEQUTFeque4etmBIYIDJ/nL2MYprFHy9t5bqJWY 4uEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762443045; x=1763047845; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ch2Eax89RB20s4DR1TXaJcyV6BYdXbU+N7gMw+0YTgc=; b=vS6bQwKyL2G9BL+Q7R9ocYhswfAL9zSqflwPNWu+QYMFbONvRAR86FIpUZ56Xf0hvy BYb0WGnZrFGP5ZXrqk5isxRxKfM3b/1q873SbnejHfm6NfVJieKHYbL5KXj3d360D80U DYbMqO1NfSFoXkvQXH3WBSzlHEN/TfEdmbAbbRzsBosnJRPQRXpTkOER9yM5doPvvY5g AKb6PXNcmtkgKkFDOVwKHrxdIKiUEGNVR+n/2lu2etDeOV+7IgXNMBc/1c5t58Hyc83w Usfe7EQ1lMKyFDUiXGzo42kTPc7n4Bqf3MFtRi/FQmqN53bTRY9SeycuZL6zd72ojy7f GlOQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVk9lp2NF31MLE+lPi4egCQDgeTeaeXarduHzPB4a5WQkO2qfaZ/+xjnBxjr8PQyFkj8rj/cNFgHpkdQeY=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyxJSVl6gWVVe+afzCh6HHua6hUAH/HqXT97yBb4MPPm8WD9VY9 lZQzixNMuouPBWnS1sV2OoPJSVSHVEKnCj3VzV7kwQS1o0Ut02Lk7NsR X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncujj30LhUGVqNR08SI5idAPOVxHyiBNTT0zP9JEEEzO/ZlHR5T4GmcrxkbwBk7 4ZrY3+e8x29GPHbCJJ1bH6uniWDodB1IBhI+BIODIuNDrLd9isGTMorLxmHezLBSzSXBYHlHm3v /1XjnyoIbPEqKBdTGK9tCjJrUoUhMbgWwVAiPJ6p1gZ4cnxCeG18DZ6YwV5DaSIN9eoH0cx/Clz clRvzFjdXeq9n2Iql13IjLJAekr+/+n9Wh+tVuU0v40mwlKv64KQmuY3Hg79MnJ+j0dwNeJJxeT Ziu74TRmrOiF/Ncz9l82uMw1IL7W4ODrFtknEZ/Ev+ELZiryFVqvkDCCEzSoXRpCbsyEQ7UrGph ojYYCk5Gv6mYjrUtu0Uq8euwFMb9omWtjEY6v1H2f9xgU5qo4DV57DBOdFtokeonM0aQgyQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IETjPi/syUrYuUHgX8SQG+xTr+eodzweo3dFQjAnqtz4bbr/W13GjAuzidsPI5Zi5wtliKfZg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3ba2:b0:477:5ca6:4d51 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4775ce1e87fmr42655585e9.3.1762443044287; Thu, 06 Nov 2025 07:30:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([2a02:2f04:d406:ee00:dfee:13dd:e044:2156]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-429eb4ad993sm5677289f8f.47.2025.11.06.07.30.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Nov 2025 07:30:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 17:30:40 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Paolo Abeni Cc: "Sverdlin, Alexander" , "daniel@makrotopia.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "andrew@lunn.ch" , "robh@kernel.org" , "lxu@maxlinear.com" , "john@phrozen.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "yweng@maxlinear.com" , "bxu@maxlinear.com" , "edumazet@google.com" , "conor+dt@kernel.org" , "fchan@maxlinear.com" , "ajayaraman@maxlinear.com" , "krzk+dt@kernel.org" , "hauke@hauke-m.de" , "horms@kernel.org" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "jpovazanec@maxlinear.com" , "linux@armlinux.org.uk" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 12/12] net: dsa: add driver for MaxLinear GSW1xx switch family Message-ID: <20251106153040.k7wnctqb6rcpafgs@skbuf> References: <8f36e6218221bb9dad6aabe4989ee4fc279581ce.camel@siemens.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 03:38:04PM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On 11/4/25 9:03 AM, Sverdlin, Alexander wrote: > > The problems I had in the past were neither related to the GSW145 code, > > nor to am65-cpsw-nuss, but to the test itself: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251104061723.483301-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com/ > > > > The remaining failing test cases are: > > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address [FAIL] > > reception succeeded, but should have failed > > TEST: VLAN over vlan_filtering=1 bridged port: Unicast IPv4 to unknown MAC address, allmulti [FAIL] > > reception succeeded, but should have failed > > > > So far I didn't notice any problems with untagged read-word IP traffic over > > GSW145 ports. > > > > Do you have a suggestion what could I check further regarding the failing > > test cases? As I understood, all of them pass on your side? > > Could be that due to different revisions of the relevant H/W? > > I tend to think we are better off merging the series as-is, and handle > the above with follow-up, as needed. Any different opinions? Yeah, it's a problem with the test. I too agree with merging as-is. I do have some nitpicks but they don't require resending the 12-patch series.