From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
yang@os.amperecomputing.com, david@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org,
dev.jain@arm.com, scott@os.amperecomputing.com, cl@gentwo.org
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] Don't sleep in split_kernel_leaf_mapping() when in atomic context
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:09:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251106160945.3182799-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> (raw)
Hi Will,
This is v2 of the fix for split_kernel_leaf_mapping(). I've expanded it into 3
patches based on feedback from v1 [1].
Once happy with the content, patch 1 is needed urgently for next -rc to fix
regression since 6.18-rc1. The other patches could wait until 6.19, but I'd
prefer they all go together into 6.18.
Changes since v1 [1]
====================
Patch 1: The fix
- Removed arch_kfence_init_pool() declaration for !KFENCE case (per Will)
- Removed lazy mode mmu optimization (now separate patch) (per Will)
- Simplified arch_kfence_init_pool() return expression (per Will)
- Added comment about not needing tlbi
- Generalized comment softirq -> atomic (per Yang Shi)
Patch 2: lazy mode mmu optimization (per Will)
Patch 3: force_pte_mapping() tidy ups (per David)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20251103125738.3073566-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com/
Thanks,
Ryan
Ryan Roberts (3):
arm64: mm: Don't sleep in split_kernel_leaf_mapping() when in atomic
context
arm64: mm: Optimize range_split_to_ptes()
arm64: mm: Tidy up force_pte_mapping()
arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h | 3 +-
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 16:09 Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-11-06 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] arm64: mm: " Ryan Roberts
2025-11-06 20:46 ` Yang Shi
2025-11-07 12:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-06 21:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-06 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: mm: Optimize range_split_to_ptes() Ryan Roberts
2025-11-06 20:47 ` Yang Shi
2025-11-06 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: mm: Tidy up force_pte_mapping() Ryan Roberts
2025-11-06 20:51 ` Yang Shi
2025-11-06 21:08 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-07 15:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Don't sleep in split_kernel_leaf_mapping() when in atomic context Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251106160945.3182799-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®