From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C008433AD; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.183 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762855921; cv=none; b=gjM9gyul3ppEm17UwQcvrkDN+wMVOkQ948KcroyX37l9Cci8WNOuQKqtJc4FSxpwxEV1E90gUy35JC5yKFLqwYWAPNS9djrEVp48hXJnOVQHhME3TksxSz0FsWHrG3lX/EdTKl7UPq/8XKWK+YoY1vY97ICA6oQrKaBHlh2jLGg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762855921; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+gnXsHIuPue0wwQewdVdbndYYyc3aZpBEaD0suWVBTQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Oc2ISpyMvIrfVp7GyQh9xixKHJ4YJpH0QzKR5XVvN7xQKeVsUR5lulVJwBMqvKz1yp4BTXaN37lS5J9GgPcDufuMdItW65wGI5zPYq8X+MX+oItyIVwJIsJE0qEf5sGM/57nG9JsduhLELYOiLAqeOemGBXbAJGPC5KtCyOlfB0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=140.211.166.183 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org Received: from localhost (unknown [116.232.48.119]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange secp256r1 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dlan) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F108340DD9; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 18:11:49 +0800 From: Yixun Lan To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: michael.opdenacker@rootcommit.com, Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Yangyu Chen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, spacemit@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: spacemit: Add OrangePi R2S board Message-ID: <20251111101149-GYE1651402@gentoo.org> References: <20251110220641.1751392-1-michael.opdenacker@rootcommit.com> <20251110220641.1751392-2-michael.opdenacker@rootcommit.com> <20251111-inquisitive-ambrosial-chicken-861542@kuoka> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251111-inquisitive-ambrosial-chicken-861542@kuoka> Hi Krzysztof, On 08:43 Tue 11 Nov , Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:06:48PM +0000, michael.opdenacker@rootcommit.com wrote: > > From: Michael Opdenacker > > > > Document the compatible string for the OrangePi R2S board [1], which > > is marketed as using the Ky X1 SoC but is in fact identical to Maybe, just say it "same" to clarify the ambiguity? > > the SpacemiT K1 SoC [2]. > > Different SoC means different compatible. It is very, very unlikely that > different vendor made same die, which would warrant same compatible. > Identical does not mean the same die, so your explanation is not > complete. Unfortunately, it's true that Ky X1 is just a rebrand of SpacemiT K1 SoC. I guess it's a marketing strategy although personally I don't know what's the motivation behind and even wish it never happens.. -- Yixun Lan (dlan)