From: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
To: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <coresight@lists.linaro.org>, <dianders@chromium.org>,
<james.clark@linaro.org>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
<krzk@kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<mike.leach@linaro.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<ruanjinjie@huawei.com>, <saravanak@google.com>,
<suzuki.poulose@arm.com>, <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] arch_topology: drop the use of cpu_node in the pr_info
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:00:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251111150033.00002254.alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250905161830.37-3-alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
On Fri, 5 Sep 2025 17:18:25 +0100
Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com> wrote:
Hi everyone,
+CC Sudeep.
I checked the patchset related to this patch and it still applies.
Just a reminder if case you think it is ready.
Thanks,
Alireza
> Remove the use of cpu_node in the pr_info(). When of_cpu_node_to_id() fails,
> it may set a pointer, cpu_node, and the get_cpu_for_node() function uses that
> pointer to log further in the fail scenario.
>
> Also, change the structure to exit early in fail scenarios which will
> help enabling code unification that follows in this series.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alireza Sanaee <alireza.sanaee@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 1037169abb45..6fafd86f608a 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -481,12 +481,13 @@ static int __init get_cpu_for_node(struct device_node *node)
> return -1;
>
> cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(cpu_node);
> - if (cpu >= 0)
> - topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cpu_node, cpu);
> - else
> - pr_info("CPU node for %pOF exist but the possible cpu range is :%*pbl\n",
> - cpu_node, cpumask_pr_args(cpu_possible_mask));
> + if (cpu < 0) {
> + pr_info("CPU node exist but the possible cpu range is :%*pbl\n",
> + cpumask_pr_args(cpu_possible_mask));
> + return cpu;
> + }
>
> + topology_parse_cpu_capacity(cpu_node, cpu);
> return cpu;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-11 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-05 16:18 [PATCH v4 0/6] Refactoring finding CPU phandles in DT Alireza Sanaee
2025-09-05 16:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] of: add infra for finding CPU id from phandle Alireza Sanaee
2025-09-05 16:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] arch_topology: drop the use of cpu_node in the pr_info Alireza Sanaee
2025-11-11 15:00 ` Alireza Sanaee [this message]
2025-09-05 16:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] arch_topology: update CPU map to use of_cpu_phandle_to_id Alireza Sanaee
2025-09-05 16:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] coresight: cti: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU id Alireza Sanaee
2025-09-10 16:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-09-05 16:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] coresight: Use of_cpu_phandle_to_id for grabbing CPU ID Alireza Sanaee
2025-09-10 16:29 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-09-05 16:18 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] perf/arm-dsu: refactor cpu id retrieval via new API of_cpu_phandle_to_id Alireza Sanaee
2025-09-10 16:29 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251111150033.00002254.alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--to=alireza.sanaee@huawei.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®