mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laura Nao <laura.nao@collabora.com>
To: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Cc: andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com,
	angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	bchihi@baylibre.com, colin.i.king@gmail.com, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, frank-w@public-files.de,
	fshao@chromium.org, kernel@collabora.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	lala.lin@mediatek.com, laura.nao@collabora.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, lukasz.luba@arm.com,
	matthias.bgg@gmail.com, nfraprado@collabora.com,
	rafael@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com,
	srini@kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 4/9] thermal: mediatek: lvts: Add platform ops to support alternative conversion logic
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:20:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251113162053.281093-1-laura.nao@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1e0545da-5d24-4ca4-863d-0d5671902d0b@linaro.org>

Hi Daniel,

On 11/10/25 14:06, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 10/16/25 16:21, Laura Nao wrote:
>> Introduce lvts_platform_ops struct to support SoC-specific versions of
>> lvts_raw_to_temp() and lvts_temp_to_raw() conversion functions.
>>
>> This is in preparation for supporting SoCs like MT8196/MT6991, which
>> require a different lvts_temp_to_raw() implementation.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org>
>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>> Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao <laura.nao@collabora.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
>> index 4ef549386add..df1c0f059ad0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
>> @@ -125,8 +125,14 @@ struct lvts_ctrl_data {
>>               continue; \
>>           else
>>   +struct lvts_platform_ops {
>> +    int (*lvts_raw_to_temp)(u32 raw_temp, int temp_factor);
>> +    u32 (*lvts_temp_to_raw)(int temperature, int temp_factor);
>> +};
>> +
>>   struct lvts_data {
>>       const struct lvts_ctrl_data *lvts_ctrl;
>> +    const struct lvts_platform_ops *ops;
>>       const u32 *conn_cmd;
>>       const u32 *init_cmd;
>>       int num_cal_offsets;
>> @@ -300,6 +306,7 @@ static int lvts_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
>>       struct lvts_ctrl *lvts_ctrl = container_of(lvts_sensor, struct lvts_ctrl,
>>                              sensors[lvts_sensor->id]);
>>       const struct lvts_data *lvts_data = lvts_ctrl->lvts_data;
>> +    const struct lvts_platform_ops *ops = lvts_data->ops;
>>       void __iomem *msr = lvts_sensor->msr;
>>       u32 value;
>>       int rc;
>> @@ -332,7 +339,7 @@ static int lvts_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
>>       if (rc)
>>           return -EAGAIN;
>>   -    *temp = lvts_raw_to_temp(value & 0xFFFF, lvts_data->temp_factor);
>> +    *temp = ops->lvts_raw_to_temp(value & 0xFFFF, lvts_data->temp_factor); 
>
> Don't do this in each functions. It does not help for the readability.
>
> May be something like:
>
> int lvts_raw_to_temp(u32 raw_temp, const struct lvts_ctrl_data)
> {
>     return data->ops->lvts_temp_to_raw(raw_temp, data->temp_factor);
> }
>
> or
>
> int lvts_raw_to_temp(u32 raw_temp, const struct lvts_ctrl_data)
> {
>     int temperature;
>
>     if (data->ops->lvts_temp_to_raw)
>         return data->ops->lvts_temp_to_raw(raw_temp, data->temp_factor);
>
>     temperature = ((s64)(raw_temp & 0xFFFF) * temp_factor) >> 14;
>         temperature += golden_temp_offset;
>
>         return temperature;
> }
>
> ... and get rid of all the lvts_platform_ops_v1
>
> (btw _v1 is confusing, it suggests there multiple versions of the same SoC)
>

Right, the first option looks more efficient. Since temp_offset is 
already part of lvts_data, the function would look like:

int lvts_raw_to_temp(u32 raw_temp, const struct lvts_data *lvts_data)
{
	return lvts_data->ops->lvts_raw_to_temp(raw_temp, lvts_data->temp_factor);
}

and the same pattern applies for temp_to_raw().

This change will require renaming the existing 
lvts_raw_to_temp()/lvts_temp_to_raw()/lvts_temp_to_raw_v2() 
implementations. I agree the current _v1 and _v2 suffixes aren’t very 
descriptive. Since lvts_temp_to_raw_v2() version is only used by MT8196,
it could be renamed to lvts_temp_to_raw_mt8196(), with the corresponding 
platform ops defined as lvts_platform_ops_mt8196. The base 
lvts_raw_to_temp()/lvts_temp_to_raw() are shared across the other SoCs,
so they could be renamed after the first supported platform (mt7988) and 
reused for all SoCs that share the same logic.

I'll send out a v4 with the proposed changes.

Thanks,

Laura

> [ ... ]
>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-13 16:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16 14:21 [PATCH RESEND v3 0/9] Add thermal sensor driver support for Mediatek MT8196 Laura Nao
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 1/9] dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controller support for MT8196 Laura Nao
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 2/9] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: Make number of calibration offsets configurable Laura Nao
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 3/9] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: Guard against zero temp_factor in lvts_raw_to_temp Laura Nao
2025-11-10 12:42   ` Daniel Lezcano
2025-11-13 16:18     ` Laura Nao
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 4/9] thermal: mediatek: lvts: Add platform ops to support alternative conversion logic Laura Nao
2025-11-10 13:06   ` Daniel Lezcano
2025-11-13 16:20     ` Laura Nao [this message]
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 5/9] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: Add lvts_temp_to_raw variant Laura Nao
2025-11-10 13:07   ` Daniel Lezcano
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 6/9] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: Add support for ATP mode Laura Nao
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 7/9] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: Support MSR offset for 16-bit calibration data Laura Nao
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 8/9] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: Add MT8196 support Laura Nao
2025-10-16 14:21 ` [PATCH RESEND v3 9/9] dt-bindings: nvmem: mediatek: efuse: Add support for MT8196 Laura Nao
2025-10-17 17:00 ` Aw: [PATCH RESEND v3 0/9] Add thermal sensor driver support for Mediatek MT8196 frank-w
2025-10-27 10:28 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251113162053.281093-1-laura.nao@collabora.com \
    --to=laura.nao@collabora.com \
    --cc=andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bchihi@baylibre.com \
    --cc=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
    --cc=fshao@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lala.lin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=srini@kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®