mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>
To: Manish Nagar <manish.nagar@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Fix race condition between concurrent dwc3_remove_requests() call paths
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 00:29:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114002946.427ab4xdq7qhbi2k@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADGrZwXmnKn68v_cR3o+MiLPAyo+ujtgbx50sK=+4rOfgcoyBA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2025, Manish Nagar wrote:
> Hi ,
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion ,
> 
> On above your suggestion, I added a check for  dep->number as 
> 
> if ((req->status == DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_COMPLETED) && (dep->number > 1))
> return;
> 
> I included this condition to prevent enumeration failures. During the sequence
> dwc3_gadget_giveback → dwc3_ep0_interrupt → dwc3_thread_interrupt, the giveback
> for ep0 does not complete, so this check ensures proper handling.
> 
> Please share your feedback, and I will proceed with v2 accordingly.
> 

No, add checks for ep0 too.

Try this:

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
index b4229aa13f37..e0bad5708664 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/ep0.c
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ static int __dwc3_gadget_ep0_queue(struct dwc3_ep *dep,
 	req->request.actual	= 0;
 	req->request.status	= -EINPROGRESS;
 	req->epnum		= dep->number;
+	req->status		= DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_QUEUED;
 
 	list_add_tail(&req->list, &dep->pending_list);
 
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
index 1f67fb6aead5..a1d2ff9254b4 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
@@ -228,6 +228,13 @@ void dwc3_gadget_giveback(struct dwc3_ep *dep, struct dwc3_request *req,
 {
 	struct dwc3			*dwc = dep->dwc;
 
+	/*
+	 * The request might have been processed and completed while the
+	 * spinlock was released. Skip processing if already completed.
+	 */
+	if (req->status == DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_COMPLETED)
+		return;
+
 	dwc3_gadget_del_and_unmap_request(dep, req, status);
 	req->status = DWC3_REQUEST_STATUS_COMPLETED;
 
---

BR,
Thinh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-14  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-28  8:05 Manish Nagar
2025-10-28  8:46 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-29 23:47 ` Thinh Nguyen
     [not found]   ` <CADGrZwXmnKn68v_cR3o+MiLPAyo+ujtgbx50sK=+4rOfgcoyBA@mail.gmail.com>
2025-11-14  0:29     ` Thinh Nguyen [this message]
2025-11-19 17:04       ` Manish Nagar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251114002946.427ab4xdq7qhbi2k@synopsys.com \
    --to=thinh.nguyen@synopsys.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manish.nagar@oss.qualcomm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®