mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] driver core: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:16:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251114141618.172154-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114141618.172154-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>

Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.

This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.

This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:

commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")

Switch to using system_dfl_wq because system_unbound_wq is going away as part of
a workqueue restructuring.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
 drivers/base/dd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 13ab98e033ea..4938a132a085 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ void driver_deferred_probe_trigger(void)
 	 * Kick the re-probe thread.  It may already be scheduled, but it is
 	 * safe to kick it again.
 	 */
-	queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &deferred_probe_work);
+	queue_work(system_dfl_wq, &deferred_probe_work);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.51.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-14 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14 14:16 [PATCH v2 0/2] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-11-14 14:16 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-11-14 14:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] driver core: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2025-12-24 14:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] replace system_unbound_wq, add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251114141618.172154-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®