From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1F4B32A3C5 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763377314; cv=none; b=p4FPBKSVLSeBZa+iLxFTmU6Uw0iYfE51C3itRK0rYBvOijzfyLfwwkZJW6r0F+Xt9T813qgXFPV2z2SC4uODpfWOkLn/8L60LIxJ15INN18ZD4kLKJx5S2gkT2DLKZvmUH4m1N+Qa8r2n6iM8iFLjs8dhLtdl1MmgGPrdxzwL2Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763377314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hRwi0JuEOG0/Q5wbZRQ9aEH8Xxaej/xNQwGvHlr0QlY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kTruqS7i1NRVOgJ6ktEJAkY6mCIU/W/KHtPQ0c9R6ftEBPvBSvqu41C+UTn+vToigLSweb9snoHmmStRC0od3Sh7/pEsqanFEbiKT3A0kRAaW410ityGdI9OEbjnuiVxS8S7kkTWyuA3KqdXIZUvzcQVP7YivO+nrlMK9mdOUFo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=WRqJxrmn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WRqJxrmn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1763377312; x=1794913312; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hRwi0JuEOG0/Q5wbZRQ9aEH8Xxaej/xNQwGvHlr0QlY=; b=WRqJxrmn7amZZyxw3J3KW5TbeOB/+B0CAlLx2C+ofqnmudDO1VFfXO8d j83850/qTTLtxHSxFAV00lNQOeQ6JjYHs2f2Y8nTBqpVmvWZrm+RX/9vL qHoQo/Ob8DQIvj3KXFkJ7u3mee89WGSfqzynsFs11guXOIH7s1m1QI5Ri B7deK8oFFGAgl9WjUDTCntb0rYQSVFcnY6rhdHH605Y2giUkVkAiYi98w QSFibbkHASZ+SKY/nWOFJFak14y5Ou1OKi3xYtmviUmBCURofZAeWhgfT D9imiMtSjilAKCxV+VMULVVc2s3JO+RgqTspQZJDm+WS1/T1IOrI5EYpt w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PqOWcAPQTdOHUrYsX1Cf/w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xowl/cWJQnS1WTKVK3Ve6A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11615"; a="88020543" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,311,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="88020543" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Nov 2025 03:01:51 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AMVlskWeSsGBm+SpmLo+XA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UqsSUeOiTJOxvo5z479F8w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,311,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="194528105" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO adf6d29aa8d9) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2025 03:01:47 -0800 Received: from kbuild by adf6d29aa8d9 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vKwzQ-0000ST-25; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 11:01:44 +0000 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 19:00:56 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Pingfan Liu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Pingfan Liu , Waiman Long , Chen Ridong , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Pierre Gondois , Ingo Molnar , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , Tejun Heo , Johannes Weiner , mkoutny@suse.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 2/2] sched/deadline: Walk up cpuset hierarchy to decide root domain when hot-unplug Message-ID: <202511171843.cLkhUJ9Q-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251117092732.16419-3-piliu@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251117092732.16419-3-piliu@redhat.com> Hi Pingfan, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tj-cgroup/for-next] [also build test ERROR on tip/sched/core peterz-queue/sched/core linus/master v6.18-rc6 next-20251114] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pingfan-Liu/cgroup-cpuset-Introduce-cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked/20251117-173841 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251117092732.16419-3-piliu%40redhat.com patch subject: [PATCHv6 2/2] sched/deadline: Walk up cpuset hierarchy to decide root domain when hot-unplug config: nios2-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251117/202511171843.cLkhUJ9Q-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251117/202511171843.cLkhUJ9Q-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511171843.cLkhUJ9Q-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:58: kernel/sched/deadline.c: In function 'dl_get_task_effective_cpus': >> kernel/sched/deadline.c:2937:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked'; did you mean 'cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 2937 | cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked(p, cpus); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +2937 kernel/sched/deadline.c 2910 2911 /* 2912 * This function always returns a non-empty bitmap in @cpus. This is because 2913 * if a root domain has reserved bandwidth for DL tasks, the DL bandwidth 2914 * check will prevent CPU hotplug from deactivating all CPUs in that domain. 2915 */ 2916 static void dl_get_task_effective_cpus(struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *cpus) 2917 { 2918 const struct cpumask *hk_msk; 2919 2920 hk_msk = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN); 2921 if (housekeeping_enabled(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)) { 2922 if (!cpumask_intersects(p->cpus_ptr, hk_msk)) { 2923 /* 2924 * CPUs isolated by isolcpu="domain" always belong to 2925 * def_root_domain. 2926 */ 2927 cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpu_active_mask, hk_msk); 2928 return; 2929 } 2930 } 2931 2932 /* 2933 * If a root domain holds a DL task, it must have active CPUs. So 2934 * active CPUs can always be found by walking up the task's cpuset 2935 * hierarchy up to the partition root. 2936 */ > 2937 cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked(p, cpus); 2938 } 2939 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki