From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: catalin.marinas@arm.com
Cc: 21cnbao@gmail.com, ada.coupriediaz@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
maz@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
surenb@google.com, v-songbaohua@oppo.com, will@kernel.org,
zhengtangquan@oppo.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 05:12:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251117211238.50126-1-21cnbao@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aRYhJO9_eR9W-EnZ@arm.com>
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 2:19 AM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 10:31:15AM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > index 1f9ee9759426..a0b45f84a91f 100644
> > --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> > @@ -403,9 +403,16 @@ void dma_direct_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
> > swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(dev, paddr, sg->length, dir);
> >
> > if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
> > - arch_sync_dma_for_device(paddr, sg->length,
> > - dir);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
> > + arch_sync_dma_for_device_batch_add(paddr, sg->length, dir);
> > +#else
> > + arch_sync_dma_for_device(paddr, sg->length, dir);
> > +#endif
> > }
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
> > + if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
> > + arch_sync_dma_batch_flush();
> > +#endif
> > }
> > #endif
>
> Just a high-level comment for now. I'm not opposed to the idea of
> batching the DSB barriers, we do this for ptes. However, the way it's
Thanks, Catalin. I agree we need batching, as phones and embedded systems
could use many DMA buffers while some chips lack DMA-coherency.
> implemented in the generic files, with lots of #ifdefs, makes the code
> pretty unreadable.
>
> Can we have something like arch_sync_dma_begin/end() and let the arch
> code handle the barriers as they see fit?
I guess I can refactor it as below and then remove the #ifdef/#else/#endif blocks.
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
index 8fcd0a9c1f39..73bca4d7149d 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-map-ops.h
@@ -373,6 +373,20 @@ void arch_sync_dma_for_device_batch_add(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_batch_add(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
enum dma_data_direction dir);
void arch_sync_dma_batch_flush(void);
+#else
+static inline void arch_sync_dma_for_device_batch_add(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
+ enum dma_data_direction dir)
+{
+ arch_sync_dma_for_device(paddr, size, dir);
+}
+static inline void arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_batch_add(phys_addr_t paddr, size_t size,
+ enum dma_data_direction dir)
+{
+ arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(paddr, size, dir);
+}
+static inline void arch_sync_dma_batch_flush(void)
+{
+}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU_ALL
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index a0b45f84a91f..69b14b0c0501 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
@@ -403,16 +403,10 @@ void dma_direct_sync_sg_for_device(struct device *dev,
swiotlb_sync_single_for_device(dev, paddr, sg->length, dir);
if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
arch_sync_dma_for_device_batch_add(paddr, sg->length, dir);
-#else
- arch_sync_dma_for_device(paddr, sg->length, dir);
-#endif
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
arch_sync_dma_batch_flush();
-#endif
}
#endif
@@ -429,11 +423,7 @@ void dma_direct_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
phys_addr_t paddr = dma_to_phys(dev, sg_dma_address(sg));
if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_batch_add(paddr, sg->length, dir);
-#else
- arch_sync_dma_for_cpu(paddr, sg->length, dir);
-#endif
swiotlb_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, paddr, sg->length, dir);
@@ -443,9 +433,7 @@ void dma_direct_sync_sg_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev)) {
arch_sync_dma_for_cpu_all();
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
arch_sync_dma_batch_flush();
-#endif
}
}
@@ -458,29 +446,19 @@ void dma_direct_unmap_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl,
{
struct scatterlist *sg;
int i;
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
bool need_sync = false;
-#endif
for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
if (sg_dma_is_bus_address(sg)) {
sg_dma_unmark_bus_address(sg);
} else {
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
need_sync = true;
dma_direct_unmap_phys_batch_add(dev, sg->dma_address,
sg_dma_len(sg), dir, attrs);
-
-#else
- dma_direct_unmap_phys(dev, sg->dma_address,
- sg_dma_len(sg), dir, attrs);
-#endif
}
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
if (need_sync && !dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
arch_sync_dma_batch_flush();
-#endif
}
#endif
@@ -490,9 +468,7 @@ int dma_direct_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl, int nents,
struct pci_p2pdma_map_state p2pdma_state = {};
struct scatterlist *sg;
int i, ret;
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
bool need_sync = false;
-#endif
for_each_sg(sgl, sg, nents, i) {
switch (pci_p2pdma_state(&p2pdma_state, dev, sg_page(sg))) {
@@ -504,14 +480,9 @@ int dma_direct_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl, int nents,
*/
break;
case PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NONE:
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
need_sync = true;
sg->dma_address = dma_direct_map_phys_batch_add(dev, sg_phys(sg),
sg->length, dir, attrs);
-#else
- sg->dma_address = dma_direct_map_phys(dev, sg_phys(sg),
- sg->length, dir, attrs);
-#endif
if (sg->dma_address == DMA_MAPPING_ERROR) {
ret = -EIO;
goto out_unmap;
@@ -529,10 +500,8 @@ int dma_direct_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sgl, int nents,
sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_BATCHED_DMA_SYNC
if (need_sync && !dev_is_dma_coherent(dev))
arch_sync_dma_batch_flush();
-#endif
return nents;
out_unmap:
Thanks
Barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 2:31 [RFC PATCH 0/5] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync Barry Song
2025-10-29 2:31 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] arm64: Provide dcache_by_myline_op_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-10-29 2:31 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm64: Provide dcache_clean_poc_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-10-29 2:31 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] arm64: Provide dcache_inval_poc_nosync helper Barry Song
2025-10-29 2:31 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] arm64: Provide arch_sync_dma_ batched helpers Barry Song
2025-10-29 2:31 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] dma-mapping: Allow batched DMA sync operations if supported by the arch Barry Song
2025-11-13 18:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-11-17 21:12 ` Barry Song [this message]
2025-11-21 16:09 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-11-21 23:28 ` Barry Song
2025-11-24 18:11 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-11-06 20:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] dma-mapping: arm64: support batched cache sync Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251117211238.50126-1-21cnbao@gmail.com \
--to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®