From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F126F30DEDD; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:25:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763627103; cv=none; b=a/ap7+SLTp6mERUZBZ/oxIh3uhWSkdEsDH1stWCByr0+iYlmCIXBUvpG6Gg346XjH/tQshV3vnVOKxGobbWZLaFqZekyGpp0U7q/pxtjmpOdl791+1YJGB/gl/DCx832Xx0j4wL1kMzM2PgBfqYsDR/4iPPn7IIDaVkbuapFhjY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763627103; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1Xn5Sh69vBo1kPivyK9OnESXDYMQbUtggKYy7JqDebE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=adcfkwmYxfIympi5/j0lH/iDmMgEiJ+5B1SX7DBJUy/stQYU7ji8cqkpdxddoT0ZGpNcnYWeBnwShdwsPBNFMVFQuLNgY0R2izdPnusr9S3dCtLI78F2qsqAMvf/sl5lzxRp3bGnX6Cchc6fOJTR3FxYYNm6/8tAvdzQ9qUIV1M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RuhsLNFa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RuhsLNFa" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA62DC4CEF1; Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:25:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1763627102; bh=1Xn5Sh69vBo1kPivyK9OnESXDYMQbUtggKYy7JqDebE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RuhsLNFa7vN+h7eI3AjwM07CoSJ8MRL3N2PTXww0KYWe9UDS+Xj0fpCna1nnGJGpH +lj6AhAURxx49kXo8/crWpZuQfbQ9tykOuVd85r9AKuP2dxV9v89QMG64F85QDDhQd cnrL+sJpCIhHV6ImSGnOpjLz06vrhNs52c3wd8vxVzAhgJ0wXm6hT3p/BTzABpjv3G ve7XdaMM8Q6+IvYsr90YyI4m4QUicC17oIpd3MQUtkx9TAoVOnmLJ/GThXAb+5P1p2 dh8qAfQC1TThqDOnXHqDJDjlbrBPbFxwnSk0ndaRwKaf1ci4VYy61HJpjY1DlbmyC2 usQmT2GXsrZ1g== Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 09:24:59 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Jingyi Wang Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Lorenzo Pieralisi , aiqun.yu@oss.qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com, trilok.soni@oss.qualcomm.com, yijie.yang@oss.qualcomm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: cpus: Add Qualcomm Oryon compatibles Message-ID: <20251120-tacky-perfect-barnacle-0fb27d@kuoka> References: <20251119-oryon-binding-v1-1-f79a101b0391@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251119-oryon-binding-v1-1-f79a101b0391@oss.qualcomm.com> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 09:50:53PM -0800, Jingyi Wang wrote: > Previous "qcom,oryon" is too generic, add specific cpu bindings: Why is too generic? Why gen1/2/3 is not generic? Both sound exactly the same for me - arbitrary number incremented from 1 does not make it less generic. > qcom,oryon-gen1 for X1E80100, qcom,oryon-gen2 for SM8750, qcom,oryon-gen3 > for Kaanapali. > > Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang Best regards, Krzysztof