From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A1DC21348; Sat, 22 Nov 2025 03:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763783191; cv=none; b=Rd4FspCEIYvNoXonj4/sLs+JFAzRxobV4iiZx1UQeEMz9xDT/8qDoZRUmdssUmgCkVy3IwlEMTI6FterKiHFt3mQ28NJO+l9C4kUIuI1COoOFX+iMm8jHP14Nrk1A7KorkHCGqOrMVvN8OK9E0lY5WPmrKb1MtL3W3t6xf71He4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763783191; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1PWlpAxv9qHCUg0Lg+xjbR8jZhun3jTGIb0Fa9LsBX8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KbPBvsxZ6ZnIRJgZege9hTP2mLOvcW45LMshEAWcASdDFNslfvXS3tT+B1l9wLHAL7iysT/2DfYGTasF/7ORSH8i9HAYnPz0Ve8somGmqVSkGNBHkQvrc9N0nLcvlqbgNrq32hcfLRe//pOTL9ZbV2OPNTVClAxEcC3iWHaLNkk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b=tVoIRY2w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="tVoIRY2w" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=202503; t=1763783182; bh=wNOkLSzojhQ1ZFLrlyHfJzdv169QnCIrn+vZOSuHhWo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tVoIRY2wNZz7o9pEZyakifAKu9S0iCA8glZJD+XtCG1YcJgLZ+/dUVCngOwWG2NBQ ejFvYOdPzrARz7lmJWjp/5fDvHyjzCF/pxzCZAUg8rfoIA1tvvp+RcVH7HGHZnHfSE Nj+Kbxa5lveGBZMbSs9xKbvbrCd3CnOr8ei1lg1ks58kq48poEsotzqEFJePTu9v7y U6gAYsLGwzf8r1StFgt5gDrounJzwlOQu1Tw/uNCEOmQPocKxOJxDrtoOkOYxYkSIT RXOTzv4AYAMda03lG/ERFyguCSUZId4GYHhnD7wibEdfdGyuASfYf1eC8WApYVnaLc 9ux+0KP4AqoFg== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4dCygK2RL1z4w93; Sat, 22 Nov 2025 14:46:21 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 14:46:19 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Matt Coster Cc: Frank Binns , Alessio Belle , Alexandru Dadu , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/imagination: Document pvr_device.power member Message-ID: <20251122144619.73fa991d@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20251121-device-power-doc-fix-v2-1-3417779f36c7@imgtec.com> References: <20251121-device-power-doc-fix-v2-1-3417779f36c7@imgtec.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/Cm/GPoMjwyc8_m+4cR7fODW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 --Sig_/Cm/GPoMjwyc8_m+4cR7fODW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Matt, On Fri, 21 Nov 2025 15:20:31 +0000 Matt Coster wro= te: > > Based on the build target indicated in the report, I tried (and failed) > to reproduce the reported warning using: >=20 > make W=3D1 htmldocs >=20 > I was, however, able to get the reported warning (and verify that this > patch clears it) using: >=20 > scripts/kernel-doc -none drivers/gpu/drm/imagination/pvr_device.h >=20 > Does anyone have any ideas why my invocation of htmldocs didn't seem to > have the same effect? Is it just simply that the relevant doc comment > isn't pulled into any of the rst docs; in which case how did the > linux-next build catch this warning? I just do "make htmldocs" on the final linux-next tree each day, so I have no idea what makes a difference, sorry. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/Cm/GPoMjwyc8_m+4cR7fODW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEyBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmkhMgsACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gy2Vgf3et90wX9wzyf8/OHK4kFQbn0dqj9uWfZr8X7qKrJXo1N2B4RIF2izCDHo I1W0TrbQS4BVlMggKbiYuy9cmYDUmhCPPC5KCyf0XM39+sbEjV0dzzM3OU1yifyy kwiE7QesfVsCt4a4JIRiWLErnHjQICxcPcxMzIQirPYNHezHYC9LqA3emLBU7WCR haLhQYNRUQJ+gZugT9xAoSiRUiRchymH4YEUvfiIrgaF1DG1pwx3SbUz135YnZIW 9UXba+CrVLwVgk5iOJUVw4ZA1v1ei26S9ysJFriJpNrSGiO+hZb0WmcSmFvwjj1u Xzax5hXklXMAQUUws/fTZp4qHhAg =hEPY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Cm/GPoMjwyc8_m+4cR7fODW--