From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A3A02EE5FD; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 11:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764069066; cv=none; b=kCuVFsvxOWNznK9b6213xqk9RkuoTTSLVkRNCCMwai9BQKIRej36WFixOjd+pjuCL8SSFOWZyvFZDrKdpYJFXV9mbnygTdGwuxDhPsHRzO+86gLeEvrqylDkWybzAg+0OfWI29743JnOAZVuVebjlEXe5/R6nSLWGlvwU+5zJwU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764069066; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XK7rjGRc2Nc677jOtGjLy/E3OT/7UlqQeU7obCac8QQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Vt8XKz/C4cfOrcUC+Ieknsc3mqpcjw+edNEeWfKVlA3o0GeODAX+f1b9RwaaJsgBmzc2fYhAEHQ/GLgX1B1pQK1OIZPHbFDUwRKKIrRtpj7M+CxXfuMmhShGXFecCvbXjTUUQxtR3tNHiSN70ZjmDp9Ez0N/ongyLOG4r0Qflkw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=hyO0EVwM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="hyO0EVwM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1764069063; bh=XK7rjGRc2Nc677jOtGjLy/E3OT/7UlqQeU7obCac8QQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hyO0EVwMYvTohlPbkccYriFZiWQP5OSCoysj9zU8rbpkAyUEDmhe1+1gaWUvsF4UT j+1HqOq0X67tDMPWj+j5B6AZYQ2Mm7mYevhaTuRG9pIeC0pFOu8cLFmpLd4ejCFi1X vl5gLss3pMM/PsOr130vRdhTvTwzfnHjWLpg2y6pXQ7BXWz/bp38YoKYK/7Mq+ChQY 9xXgWFuKayQ8CIQEiLMDThnQrwiUG7qNVKkwtpF3+sgUVsKopds2u5yN/QcOquLRDd hog/LddLBeHX9I6ecPDJi/TnS6/v8GJuT/vL+gmPwjOF4cAg3dSyjZCv7R8rnHaG5i GMkHRQgObP3Aw== Received: from laura.lan (unknown [IPv6:2001:b07:646b:e2:657b:ae76:a0f8:4811]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: laura.nao) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26B7117E12D5; Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:11:02 +0100 (CET) From: Laura Nao To: frank-w@public-files.de Cc: andrew-ct.chen@mediatek.com, angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com, arnd@arndb.de, bchihi@baylibre.com, colin.i.king@gmail.com, conor+dt@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, fshao@chromium.org, kernel@collabora.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, lala.lin@mediatek.com, laura.nao@collabora.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, lukasz.luba@arm.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, nfraprado@collabora.com, rafael@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, srini@kernel.org, u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com, wenst@chromium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] thermal: mediatek: lvts: Add platform ops to support alternative conversion logic Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 12:10:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20251125111046.23680-1-laura.nao@collabora.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.5 In-Reply-To: <19D052E6-7E81-455B-AB31-C805AD65F96A@public-files.de> References: <19D052E6-7E81-455B-AB31-C805AD65F96A@public-files.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/21/25 14:02, Frank Wunderlich wrote: > Am 21. November 2025 14:00:29 MEZ schrieb AngeloGioacchino Del Regno : >> Il 21/11/25 12:16, Laura Nao ha scritto: >>> Introduce lvts_platform_ops struct to support SoC-specific versions of >>> lvts_raw_to_temp() and lvts_temp_to_raw() conversion functions. >>> >>> This is in preparation for supporting SoCs like MT8196/MT6991, which >>> require a different lvts_temp_to_raw() implementation. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Laura Nao >> >> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno >> >> > > Should this patch not have same prefix like the others? > > Whoops, that's right. I'll fix this, thanks for the heads up! Best, Laura