From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.alien8.de (mail.alien8.de [65.109.113.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E58EF258EC3; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 20:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=65.109.113.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764620740; cv=none; b=LBQruQz1RvgQUHSUUkocpksCFL39cjxGNmSCJknTTg+CAZbaeetS+OqTy3eaDp0UYz1ooetogv8hs6THv4DgO9jKLTmYeJayoN0DUxphbd27kUAw8TZwNhAWvfXZ0mpeBTnDR7MpR8pywLDttsqeEHCwUgqG11pRnJEKHJ14EZw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764620740; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pDqO7VkMyZWfg0EfVsPG3fuxxRGbpZBT+P0y7schoBc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sa5dnD5Po9LLEwBNemfcxFguquuBNP5UAz93Ia6yGmTvFvW4uA5cV4d/8T/OlSxc+SqypdjAJbTKM3C/I7FwC49SfqukDBJaGaqn4zBWMk3LTUKnagVnF29+rD5ua97BPt8KTtgpaAzK8v9AvL95mFPmO8WABap7a0CXDaLk2c0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b=WTvztY8M; arc=none smtp.client-ip=65.109.113.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=alien8.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alien8.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="WTvztY8M" Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.alien8.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTP id 8FA9840E022E; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 20:25:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.alien8.de Authentication-Results: mail.alien8.de (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=alien8.de Received: from mail.alien8.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.alien8.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id SbUUuFlYM96k; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 20:25:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=alien8; t=1764620729; bh=f8RYmMAyCBEl5ERgqHoDL1DaBIqwkQHFzgoqQfZgPew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WTvztY8Ms6/lrhMjl9vjeD/SJr7//Vy0DAOs09aBOChza0WmFgoy+nkJKSi4XRjdY qyZh5CKksusOx630nwoHTYRh0lnzBeN6L2Vw9O/cGC+R4LDb5whajhhQyKG3EFOjBE zwoJ3dZr4Wi8YxCXMa234jv01RqvVJO9EoReVxCRU9WXgxCwKY2uULg1aQ0xqUuFHV g4SNCQSme0dUvkCa7gtDV4IF8RuBokjTcxpxWExmm6647FccF9axFB6NUhneTjef5U 3Id/VpTWmFU7bCnytCJuPvxvy8gkE0ZJn5EsesmquA4h+l3JY4iGh9qYZYe+FFHw6q HSrwwqO5MyccIoN/74kP1s4vxCkWItfvipRgoOnmQd58ycsWVBoCHTEi+8jyToyVAC fH6uPazn5plfzQYxMY31g4otfTbqI/+2aLMqAn67kTPpJhHwr7DRHi+16nIqNAnsDv jtpAlZIXB2lw/gn8tu5OK5Mab9oECGWsf41Ps1pd3lER9KsBRCqsM3Uo8QSi4noPSE 1KXVDw3R7L7tK5btyiVqaV9czP1QpwDwrJu4ls6mOG42bqYJChOh8gw6tND3VgOP6E 8VCfNp80ZIxIQ0Cr+3NKYmfAuyM+VwELu2SpKvCyju19aBqMdPYUGsFVNhZ75W/OhN dGKHRZ5X25iW+EjT5D/lp2f4= Received: from zn.tnic (pd953063a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.83.6.58]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.alien8.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with UTF8SMTPSA id 72DAB40E0253; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 20:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 21:25:07 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" Cc: Kiryl Shutsemau , "Pratik R. Sampat" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, ardb@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, osalvador@suse.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, michael.roth@amd.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm: Add support for unaccepted memory hotplug Message-ID: <20251201202507.GFaS35o7WtLJOM0_jh@fat_crate.local> References: <20251126223127.GIaSd_v7juUkaW4RTA@fat_crate.local> <20251127181233.GBaSiUkaLzwANS_6WT@fat_crate.local> <20251128113411.GAaSmIs0kSWGhCYkaA@fat_crate.local> <47927c25-a317-488a-823f-ac0588f4eee4@kernel.org> <20251201111201.GAaS14AX18qeHN20xf@fat_crate.local> <052d7f47-edb6-4978-bc9a-c7eae469720f@kernel.org> <20251201191036.GEaS3oLBY8PEuE91Ap@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 09:10:26PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote: > Just to be clear, I don't think it exist and also I don't think that it > should exist. By that logic if it doesn't exist and someone sends a patch, I should simply ignore a review comment about that patch breaking some non-existent ABI and simply take it. Well, it certainly works for me. Unless you folks come-a-runnin' later screaming it broke some use case of yours. And then we're back to what I've been preaching on this thread from the very beginning: having a common agreement on what ABI Linux enforces. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette