From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172])
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D05927FB0E
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Tue,  2 Dec 2025 16:26:42 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1764692804; cv=none; b=EBz/180lG7D5XerRRTm+X0tEnsf9Hfxo/C/AanlgUYV85Lts//zaE2q5WuFFlK/pU1BBgcWxtBcpWCM4oUPlC1tpU5TgS8BpD8f8rLRLVxR+7Ou1lt8b180rkF+4SEs3YR1pSVa4V00CO6A+BGs5L7EmdVE1VrNEFuzbsRdS+zQ=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1764692804; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=JubwohHdl0/TxPZ+7PmkWPDX1qiRHIKtzAOAj3b/QrQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	 Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=K3gvqWSFwa/H78/fPJVxZMKGnPT8mtDMb79nQ5NepJC4tHUWmWcZZvQzi0/aEdQeUz+p1SBwLutGhIw4laYUebZPDxvskMRtvylGDQPUWz5YP9kUCTFAWjEnk6kgPdEr9iRLhQXyEe21R/dmuZKZMO9UTlbtlwu5pemzrXYSs24=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14])
	by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD3B1477;
	Tue,  2 Dec 2025 08:26:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (e132581.arm.com [10.1.196.87])
	by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15F4D3F73B;
	Tue,  2 Dec 2025 08:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 16:26:39 +0000
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	paulmck@kernel.org, usamaarif642@gmail.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, rmikey@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk/nbcon: Restore IRQ in atomic flush after each
 emitted record
Message-ID: <20251202162639.GD724103@e132581.arm.com>
References: <20251202135832.156559-1-pmladek@suse.com>
 <87o6oheywd.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87o6oheywd.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>

On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 03:39:54PM +0106, John Ogness wrote:

[...]

> I am not really happy about all the local_irq_restore() usage. Using
> guard syntax would be nice here, but AFAICT there is no guard for
> local_irq_save()/_restore().

Sorry for suddenly jumping in.  Wouldn't guard(irqsave)() be helpful
here?