From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1E9C1D63F3; Sat, 6 Dec 2025 05:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764998444; cv=none; b=QRu+pNCCXDOH+GrM/V5oHakzIUJ8M/aP92C+zlDIXAYcrQPYR8YQl1sIJ//gRD20HGkHqmto+1iR1i8awyEaGm+Lf4OkP8pTD72gHrx1pvwypAaa9sILdBfc4hIQBA/aZ4kJx8MlIqvcY7J7+Ed2PczOGMlzHXpELxzXjxLZVTM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764998444; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZFjNsLDmNldfG/5D2Bo1Qfl2RpXTUFrxrN62ffaxeME=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=q47dAAorG49EEvl8O10BeyVaITtNfSJXq5K6mzjP/ziy8hnJOd5PzDhpvi+9UPvo48O6owAbd5rVUnW2p0nFT0x0qzo/yHOWEE4WjSz6HMfbeSreXHSkh7MCMGHt2u0JxpyvT47Bk9Zg2pPiadKOJzuMdb5cRSWqc0zOeXxJBBk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=jOnD4tXH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="jOnD4tXH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1764998443; x=1796534443; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ZFjNsLDmNldfG/5D2Bo1Qfl2RpXTUFrxrN62ffaxeME=; b=jOnD4tXHFYfea9bqretoSovZs3Zr/piVDcxDyjjUrM+HDm47u7wWemS9 CQ+bEegNxuE/26SIZlMI3/z7a63x7ORfPmYI1NblOUQKL+h38cv07qaf4 OrX1QMoLBwa1S3yYFcqRXjTdW/Y87xE3OLzkAq41FrglfsR8rQqBvDFVd fJJBnQfAWaNmjWzhVeBDuEd9YAk7M9/m2md1pgCnMIJhMWBG0DTo26zV+ j+LDgwxipCn3NmYzA4oJGW/fHtQtu0mGE7Yg1HaV4oPkxbAin0Wzbmwih GmaYMA0DyamZHF7ivdXbPG24FgnSJT9HxEjmcfIU9MXYqdGIgLGCJJEPN Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QBLrcPI9RPyvUIWKJ6hR9A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ug0cRECWSVqLuymHGyedMQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11633"; a="89684191" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,254,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="89684191" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2025 21:20:43 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: M8sn2e1iS7WipgYPGUEVrg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: FnNPjzW+SuyCFsShyfMMBQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.20,254,1758610800"; d="scan'208";a="200605245" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 4664bbef4914) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2025 21:20:40 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 4664bbef4914 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vRkij-00000000Fsj-1Jo7; Sat, 06 Dec 2025 05:20:37 +0000 Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2025 13:19:46 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Patrice Chotard , Mark Brown , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Patrice Chotard Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] spi: stm32-ospi: Remove CR_TCIE and CR_TEIE irq usage Message-ID: <202512061327.9CDC4SNs-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251205-upstream_qspi_ospi_updates-v1-3-7e6c8b9f5141@foss.st.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251205-upstream_qspi_ospi_updates-v1-3-7e6c8b9f5141@foss.st.com> Hi Patrice, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on 7d0a66e4bb9081d75c82ec4957c50034cb0ea449] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Patrice-Chotard/spi-stm32-ospi-Set-DMA-maxburst-dynamically/20251205-174931 base: 7d0a66e4bb9081d75c82ec4957c50034cb0ea449 patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251205-upstream_qspi_ospi_updates-v1-3-7e6c8b9f5141%40foss.st.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/8] spi: stm32-ospi: Remove CR_TCIE and CR_TEIE irq usage config: sparc64-randconfig-002-20251206 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251206/202512061327.9CDC4SNs-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251206/202512061327.9CDC4SNs-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512061327.9CDC4SNs-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/spi/spi-stm32-ospi.c:16: drivers/spi/spi-stm32-ospi.c: In function 'stm32_ospi_wait_cmd': >> drivers/spi/spi-stm32-ospi.c:246:48: error: 'struct stm32_ospi' has no member named 'io_base'; did you mean 'mm_base'? err = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(ospi->io_base + OSPI_SR, sr, ^~~~~~~ include/linux/iopoll.h:102:3: note: in definition of macro 'poll_timeout_us_atomic' op; \ ^~ include/linux/iopoll.h:213:2: note: in expansion of macro 'read_poll_timeout_atomic' read_poll_timeout_atomic(op, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us, false, addr) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/iopoll.h:255:2: note: in expansion of macro 'readx_poll_timeout_atomic' readx_poll_timeout_atomic(readl_relaxed, addr, val, cond, delay_us, timeout_us) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/spi/spi-stm32-ospi.c:246:8: note: in expansion of macro 'readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic' err = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(ospi->io_base + OSPI_SR, sr, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +246 drivers/spi/spi-stm32-ospi.c 236 237 static int stm32_ospi_wait_cmd(struct stm32_ospi *ospi) 238 { 239 void __iomem *regs_base = ospi->regs_base; 240 u32 sr; 241 int err = 0; 242 243 if (ospi->fmode == CR_FMODE_APM) 244 goto out; 245 > 246 err = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(ospi->io_base + OSPI_SR, sr, 247 (sr & (SR_TEF | SR_TCF)), 1, 248 STM32_WAIT_CMD_TIMEOUT_US); 249 250 if (sr & SR_TCF) 251 /* avoid false timeout */ 252 err = 0; 253 if (sr & SR_TEF) 254 err = -EIO; 255 256 out: 257 /* clear flags */ 258 writel_relaxed(FCR_CTCF | FCR_CTEF, regs_base + OSPI_FCR); 259 260 if (!err) 261 err = stm32_ospi_wait_nobusy(ospi); 262 263 return err; 264 } 265 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki