From: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
To: malcolm@haak.id.au
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, surenb@google.com
Subject: Re: Possible memory leak in 6.17.7
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 19:08:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251208110829.11840-1-00107082@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251110182008.71e0858b@xps15mal>
On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:20:08 +1000
Mal Haak <malcolm@haak.id.au> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have found a memory leak in 6.17.7 but I am unsure how to track it
> down effectively.
>
> I am running a server that has a heavy read/write workload to a cephfs
> file system. It is a VM.
>
> Over time it appears that the non-cache useage of kernel dynamic
> memory increases. The kernel seems to think the pages are reclaimable
> however nothing appears to trigger the reclaim. This leads to
> workloads getting killed via oomkiller.
>
> smem -wp output:
>
> Area Used Cache Noncache
> firmware/hardware 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
> kernel image 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
> kernel dynamic memory 88.21% 36.25% 51.96%
> userspace memory 9.49% 0.15% 9.34%
> free memory 2.30% 2.30% 0.00%
>
> free -h output:
>
> total used free shared buff/cache available
> Mem: 31Gi 3.6Gi 500Mi 4.0Mi 11Gi 27Gi
> Swap: 4.0Gi 179Mi 3.8Gi
>
> Reverting to the previous LTS fixes the issue
>
> smem -wp output:
> Area Used Cache Noncache
> firmware/hardware 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
> kernel image 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
> kernel dynamic memory 80.22% 79.32% 0.90%
> userspace memory 10.48% 0.20% 10.28%
> free memory 9.30% 9.30% 0.00%
>
I think the `memory allocation profiling` feature can help.
https://docs.kernel.org/mm/allocation-profiling.html
You would need to build a kernel with
CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING=y
CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING_ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT=y
And check /proc/allocinfo for the suspicious allocations which take
more memory than expected.
(I once caught a nvidia driver memory leak.)
FYI
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 8:20 Mal Haak
2025-11-20 2:23 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-05 22:23 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-08 9:52 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-08 11:08 ` David Wang [this message]
2025-12-08 23:08 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-09 4:40 ` David Wang
2025-12-10 13:43 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-11 3:28 ` RRe: " David Wang
2025-12-11 4:23 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-15 19:42 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-12-16 1:26 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-16 2:02 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-12-16 7:00 ` David Wang
2025-12-16 7:09 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-16 11:55 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-16 12:18 ` David Wang
2025-12-16 12:42 ` David Wang
2025-12-17 1:56 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-12-17 2:28 ` Mal Haak
2025-12-17 5:59 ` David Wang
2025-12-17 6:46 ` Mal Haak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251208110829.11840-1-00107082@163.com \
--to=00107082@163.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malcolm@haak.id.au \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®