From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 269C81B81CA for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 05:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765774857; cv=none; b=LXIGgCUR+0EO63lRzdv7huicArlIX50BvswZhtig4o16WrjY1pIp5BmyeM+oEganUn9OcBNO5qlysqWhYdGM6KB+WO87kvZmEGfsk5uyNPQB7oW3bXARDvcLeR4u48FuU9Q25H2D3JPHrrXy2hjmG/73ycYElyAq432UFaaNVek= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765774857; c=relaxed/simple; bh=o9Q9SLiXHToLLMIDMeWuLeJQOlqeJqmFAH1XM6Lu/+Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ovwpr9AEn4CbsLgEwsgrj+2taa372tAhP3xxgKs9KgQn18gfLGKg5j27scu5EdcfFS04Ye4oTq9SHhCDlekwdvs9kYTdq5TylrvRyQ3x/rO50BRoItzpE1qWRJLXvCFnNgfYlz3WiML3qCTM4HckTcHu0EBUg7ROSHzBRIeo23M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QooTtXV5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QooTtXV5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765774856; x=1797310856; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=o9Q9SLiXHToLLMIDMeWuLeJQOlqeJqmFAH1XM6Lu/+Y=; b=QooTtXV5JrQ1KvAFy4NFqAVy1lyFh5CJwSZh38k7KskcWLRT+Z51oVde t6p30btOridguGzsMCsy3Na8FO3bRX056ph7De5OSJxAyALXt3KfWKSkz k8zCoG+5M7LVqaLfEW65lfm7H9tltY0KDqvWx1t25vKNaSjL7hcalRy/V DwWcuqvhc/w0Dsh8+nfPuCx3WSeYK4GdbMEOqFooVYBlrDalb4yk9/kI/ lRH3pOTpN4IIPo25PqllMTcERCsxcmadwEFaIap3kvvYTjfzVcTYbP/QD 1fuVmjcnZL80u0fUAg0EHn57vE6Gv7vh/nJfjZxs4QQIRExdJibSfR6L0 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WTVOyYQGReiubW/oKmP+uQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RwV9RjUzQ1mCvrKvrz19IA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11642"; a="78376653" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,150,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="78376653" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Dec 2025 21:00:55 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uUb91bMFSwqXizAbWiOeuw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Rnmk+5JpS5yrx036/grrag== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,150,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="197907037" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 8a0c053bdd2a) ([10.211.93.152]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Dec 2025 21:00:53 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 8a0c053bdd2a with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vV0hX-000000002Zc-1ggv; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 05:00:51 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 06:00:14 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: Aaron Tomlin , akpm@linux-foundation.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, mhiramat@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, pmladek@suse.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, sean@ashe.io, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hung_task: Enable runtime reset of hung_task_detect_count Message-ID: <202512150521.53lGwfu6-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251211033004.1628875-3-atomlin@atomlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251211033004.1628875-3-atomlin@atomlin.com> Hi Aaron, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.19-rc1 next-20251215] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aaron-Tomlin/hung_task-Consolidate-hung-task-warning-into-an-atomic-log-block/20251211-113605 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251211033004.1628875-3-atomlin%40atomlin.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] hung_task: Enable runtime reset of hung_task_detect_count config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-ltp (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251215/202512150521.53lGwfu6-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251215/202512150521.53lGwfu6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512150521.53lGwfu6-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): Warning: kernel/hung_task.c:390 function parameter 'table' not described in 'proc_dohung_task_detect_count' >> Warning: kernel/hung_task.c:390 function parameter 'write' not described in 'proc_dohung_task_detect_count' >> Warning: kernel/hung_task.c:390 function parameter 'buffer' not described in 'proc_dohung_task_detect_count' >> Warning: kernel/hung_task.c:390 function parameter 'lenp' not described in 'proc_dohung_task_detect_count' >> Warning: kernel/hung_task.c:390 function parameter 'ppos' not described in 'proc_dohung_task_detect_count' -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki