Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Checkpatch cleanup patches

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 11:44:19AM +0000, Bryant Boatright wrote:
> Correct camel case names reported by checkpatch.
> 
> These patches are not required to be applied in any order.
> 
> Changes in v3:
>    1. Patch 1: Updated parse_res to parse_result for clearer purpose per
>       feedback from gregkh@linuxfoundation.org.
>    2. Patch 1: Change definition of parse_result to multi-line definition per
>       feed feedback from gregkh@linuxfoundation.org.
>    3. Patch 2: Fix typo in commit message introduced in v2 per feedback from
>       gregkh@linuxfoundation.org.
>    4. Remove patch 2 (from v2) as name change was not needed per feedback from
>       gregkh@linuxfoundation.org.
>    5. Add changelog for patchset to cover letter per feedback from
>       gregkh@linuxfoundation.org.
> 
> Changes in v2:
>    1. Patch 1: Make enumeration constant names all upper case per feedback from
>    straube.linux@gmail.com.
> 
> Bryant Boatright (2):
>   staging: rtl8723bs: Rename camel case enumeration
>   staging: rtl8723bs: Rename camel case variable
> 
>  .../staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ieee80211.c    | 26 +++++++++----------
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/ieee80211.h | 12 ++++++---
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 
> 

These did not come through as properly linked together, how did you send
them?  Can you use something like 'b4' or 'git send-email' to send them
as a patch series, and not as unconnected emails?

thanks,

greg k-h