From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: ellyndra <ellyesparza8@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/syscall: make sys_call helpers static
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2025 21:40:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251220204059.GA272712@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMzpN2gqFPsCOktAGfU_F2_LxGu3hv0T5OJHy10mV9E_AA_AjA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 09:32:27AM -0500, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > Ofcourse. But I'm not sure I understand your concern. Both
> > x{64,32}_sys_call() only have a single caller, inlining them avoids the
> > whole call, tail or otherwise, how is that a bad thing?
> >
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 13194 128 0 13322 340a
> arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.o
> 10239 136 0 10375 2887
> arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.o.orig
>
> That's a 3k increase in text size when it's inlined.
Oh, you're talking about the calls in the switch; when that's inlined it
ends up generating a pile of doo.
The below should do.
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
index a67a644d0cfe..47ef0a10e42e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_32.c
@@ -41,12 +41,14 @@ const sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[] = {
#endif
#define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) case nr: return __ia32_##sym(regs);
-long ia32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
+static noinstr long ia32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
{
+ instrumentation_begin();
switch (nr) {
#include <asm/syscalls_32.h>
default: return __ia32_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
}
+ instrumentation_end();
}
static __always_inline int syscall_32_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c
index b6e68ea98b83..0f26f3f60b4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c
@@ -32,23 +32,33 @@ const sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[] = {
#undef __SYSCALL
#define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) case nr: return __x64_##sym(regs);
-long x64_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
+/*
+ * Explicitly noinline such that the whole switch table ends up generating
+ * tail-calls. When inlined into do_syscall_x64() it will
+ */
+static noinstr long x64_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
{
+ instrumentation_begin();
switch (nr) {
#include <asm/syscalls_64.h>
default: return __x64_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
}
+ instrumentation_end();
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
-long x32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
+static noinstr long x32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
{
+ instrumentation_begin();
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
switch (nr) {
#include <asm/syscalls_x32.h>
default: return __x64_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
}
-}
+#else
+ return __x64_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
#endif
+ instrumentation_end();
+}
static __always_inline bool do_syscall_x64(struct pt_regs *regs, int nr)
{
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
index c10dbb74cd00..59a406074dc0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscall.h
@@ -20,14 +20,6 @@
typedef long (*sys_call_ptr_t)(const struct pt_regs *);
extern const sys_call_ptr_t sys_call_table[];
-/*
- * These may not exist, but still put the prototypes in so we
- * can use IS_ENABLED().
- */
-extern long ia32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *, unsigned int nr);
-extern long x32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *, unsigned int nr);
-extern long x64_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *, unsigned int nr);
-
/*
* Only the low 32 bits of orig_ax are meaningful, so we return int.
* This importantly ignores the high bits on 64-bit, so comparisons
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-20 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 14:57 ellyndra
2025-12-20 13:50 ` Brian Gerst
2025-12-20 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-12-20 14:32 ` Brian Gerst
2025-12-20 16:52 ` ellyndra
2025-12-20 17:10 ` Brian Gerst
2025-12-20 17:45 ` ellyndra
2025-12-20 18:21 ` Brian Gerst
2025-12-20 20:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-12-20 20:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251220204059.GA272712@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ellyesparza8@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®