mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Cc: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC v2 00/17] bio cleanups
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 03:52:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251221025233.87087-1-agruenba@redhat.com> (raw)

Hello,

we are not quite careful enough about setting bio->bi_status in all
places (see BACKGROUND below).  This patch queue tries to fix this by
systematically eliminating the direct assignments to bi_status sprinkled
all throughout the code.  Please comment.

The patches are currently still based on v6.18.

GIT tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gfs2/linux-gfs2.git/log/?h=bio-cleanups

The first version of this patch queue is avaliable here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20251208121020.1780402-1-agruenba@redhat.com/

With these changes, only a few direct assignments to bio->bi_status
remain, in BTRFS and in MD, and SOME OF THOSE MAY BE UNSAFE.  Could the
maintainers of those subsystems please have a look?

Once the remaining direct assignments to bi_status are gone, we may want
to think about "write protecting" bi_status to prevent unintended new
direct assignments from creeping back in.


BACKGROUND

'struct bio' objects start out with their bi_status field initialized to
BLK_STS_OK (0).  When the bio completes, that field needs to be left
unchanged in case of success, and set to a BLK_STS_* error code
otherwise.

This is important when bios are chained (bio_chain()) because then,
multiple execution contexts will race updating the same bi_status field.
When an execution context resets bi_status to BLK_STS_OK (0) during bio
completion, this could hide the error code of the adjacent bio in the
chain.

When more than a single bio fails in a chain, we know that the resulting
bi_status will not be BLK_STS_OK, but we don't know which of the status
error codes will survive.


CRYPTO FALLBACK (SATYA TANGIRALA?)

Related to chained bios but unrelated to setting bio->bi_status,
blk_crypto_fallback_encrypt_bio() in block/blk-crypto-fallback.c swaps
out bi_private and bi_end_io and reuses the same bio for downcalls, then
restores those fields in blk_crypto_fallback_decrypt_endio() before
calling bio_endio() again on the same bio.  This will at the very least
break with chained bios because it will mess up __bi_remaining.


Thanks,
Andreas

Andreas Gruenbacher (17):
  xfs: don't clobber bi_status in xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit
  bio: rename bio_chain arguments
  bio: use bio_io_error more often
  bio: add bio_set_status
  bio: use bio_set_status for BLK_STS_* status codes
  bio: do not check bio->bi_status before assigning to it
  block: consecutive blk_status_t error codes
  block: fix blk_status_to_{errno,str} inconsistency
  block: turn blk_errors array into a macro
  block: optimize blk_status <=> errno conversion
  bio: bio_set_status from non-zero errno
  bio: do not check bio->bi_status before assigning to it (part 2)
  xfs: use bio_set_status in xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit
  bio: switch to bio_set_status in submit_bio_noacct
  bio: never set bi_status to BLK_STS_OK during completion
  bio: never set bi_status to BLK_STS_OK during completion (part 2)
  bio: add bio_endio_status

 block/bio-integrity-auto.c       |   3 +-
 block/bio.c                      |  25 +++----
 block/blk-core.c                 | 123 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 block/blk-crypto-fallback.c      |  22 +++---
 block/blk-crypto-internal.h      |   2 +-
 block/blk-crypto.c               |   4 +-
 block/blk-merge.c                |   6 +-
 block/blk-mq.c                   |  10 +--
 block/fops.c                     |   6 +-
 block/t10-pi.c                   |   2 +-
 drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c       |   8 +-
 drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c       |   2 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h    |   3 +-
 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_req.c    |   7 +-
 drivers/block/ps3vram.c          |   3 +-
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c    |   4 +-
 drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h       |   3 +-
 drivers/md/bcache/request.c      |   8 +-
 drivers/md/dm-cache-target.c     |   9 ++-
 drivers/md/dm-ebs-target.c       |   2 +-
 drivers/md/dm-flakey.c           |   2 +-
 drivers/md/dm-integrity.c        |  34 ++++-----
 drivers/md/dm-mpath.c            |   6 +-
 drivers/md/dm-pcache/dm_pcache.c |   3 +-
 drivers/md/dm-raid1.c            |   7 +-
 drivers/md/dm-thin.c             |   7 +-
 drivers/md/dm-vdo/data-vio.c     |   3 +-
 drivers/md/dm-verity-target.c    |   2 +-
 drivers/md/dm-writecache.c       |   7 +-
 drivers/md/dm-zoned-target.c     |   3 +-
 drivers/md/dm.c                  |   4 +-
 drivers/md/md.c                  |   8 +-
 drivers/md/raid1-10.c            |   3 +-
 drivers/md/raid1.c               |   2 +-
 drivers/md/raid10.c              |  20 +++--
 drivers/md/raid5.c               |   4 +-
 drivers/nvdimm/btt.c             |   4 +-
 drivers/nvdimm/pmem.c            |   4 +-
 fs/btrfs/bio.c                   |   8 +-
 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c             |   2 +-
 fs/btrfs/raid56.c                |   6 +-
 fs/crypto/bio.c                  |   2 +-
 fs/erofs/fileio.c                |   4 +-
 fs/erofs/fscache.c               |   8 +-
 fs/f2fs/data.c                   |   6 +-
 fs/f2fs/segment.c                |   3 +-
 fs/iomap/ioend.c                 |   3 +-
 fs/verity/verify.c               |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c                |   3 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c          |   4 +-
 include/linux/bio.h              |  28 ++++++-
 include/linux/blk_types.h        |   2 +-
 include/linux/blkdev.h           |  18 ++++-
 53 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)

-- 
2.52.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-12-21  2:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-21  2:52 Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 01/17] xfs: don't clobber bi_status in xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21 15:39   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 02/17] bio: rename bio_chain arguments Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 03/17] bio: use bio_io_error more often Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 04/17] bio: add bio_set_status Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 05/17] bio: use bio_set_status for BLK_STS_* status codes Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 06/17] bio: do not check bio->bi_status before assigning to it Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 07/17] block: consecutive blk_status_t error codes Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 08/17] block: fix blk_status_to_{errno,str} inconsistency Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 09/17] block: turn blk_errors array into a macro Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 10/17] block: optimize blk_status <=> errno conversion Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 11/17] bio: bio_set_status from non-zero errno Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 12/17] bio: do not check bio->bi_status before assigning to it (part 2) Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 13/17] xfs: use bio_set_status in xfs_zone_alloc_and_submit Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 14/17] bio: switch to bio_set_status in submit_bio_noacct Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 15/17] bio: never set bi_status to BLK_STS_OK during completion Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 16/17] bio: never set bi_status to BLK_STS_OK during completion (part 2) Andreas Gruenbacher
2025-12-21  2:52 ` [RFC v2 17/17] bio: add bio_endio_status Andreas Gruenbacher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251221025233.87087-1-agruenba@redhat.com \
    --to=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satyat@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®