From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 033A02F1FED; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 11:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766574264; cv=none; b=fmc5vSk9WJWBdBDF9wQYU5bBMX2k1xJSEl0JKiX2IhsDKW/rcyCnkSZodPBYWPNnNjaB42WCjAIWW04kw0meJxgHC5e8X3LxgMW/LrQ/DltG6pqwkB6J10J2c07kTZ0+W4Ns/2qytqBN06PEQmO4oGieOwDq54jhLuMMeVQzQeQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766574264; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TGPVZM4nMD9x7twsQk25x9Irb9sq1hVIlqZT26us4zU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=mS+AVK+DMhwkAsIVhLESeG4s/uBnXXqsroCP9cUwd9HnC4F2noZZdTYdPyv5FL68L27QOi5DeEYBEc0IblgadcsZrdf6et/q7Eo/sNHiOOCXKayfvAcJ588xNq30uySsqw/ehJo3a/znijIQSe/iEKbpZX4cNnkRuIaBvtT26+8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=O+mUK5Q5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="O+mUK5Q5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1766574263; x=1798110263; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=TGPVZM4nMD9x7twsQk25x9Irb9sq1hVIlqZT26us4zU=; b=O+mUK5Q5gaYSl+XJjW9Gvr3LHT9mJU+NML6PieanDNj1F9IWensx+F4+ 9DaaXpW02pWlACq4QvOdseJSmM5WW7MbfwdvUUX2+yM6aTMG9Hic3oFnV 3Zkz06Ijd/peh1zYIK0huJkRbiwJM/Bbn4HnvRg7h9Kmu3yFcRLvIfWwC no0EbDTy6fp9YoTNoqGRFcEhaKaWirmwULYPgk66/EW7JJjOEpAOKHTZS 8Dmrwwe8jZSj3SH52edj/SzPLhl1mwagIhIVYvgKG56tvuxCDl+sHB6Fm BxB+LJHT6HiPiM0cy/e33NPJ5KFKiaD94EuaCp/HXp5auhBtFRpxisfyk Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /O1e7lqtS5iysYvwOuPmUA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Prz6IZO7Tq6Gjd8DgKR2ig== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11651"; a="79047423" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,173,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="79047423" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Dec 2025 03:04:22 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: S95frWbtSnKrRpN0i0ynxQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /Ljq0TLcS9yjarukWq32gg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,173,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="200493602" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO dd3453e2b682) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Dec 2025 03:04:02 -0800 Received: from kbuild by dd3453e2b682 with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vYMeL-000000002y5-0HbK; Wed, 24 Dec 2025 11:03:29 +0000 Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2025 19:03:07 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Pavel Tikhomirov , Tejun Heo Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Johannes Weiner , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Tikhomirov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup-v2/freezer: Print information about unfreezable process Message-ID: <202512241804.JAJl5a7k-lkp@intel.com> References: <20251223102124.738818-4-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251223102124.738818-4-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> Hi Pavel, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tj-cgroup/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.19-rc2 next-20251219] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pavel-Tikhomirov/cgroup-v2-freezer-allow-freezing-with-kthreads/20251223-182826 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251223102124.738818-4-ptikhomirov%40virtuozzo.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] cgroup-v2/freezer: Print information about unfreezable process config: arm64-randconfig-r134-20251224 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251224/202512241804.JAJl5a7k-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4ef602d446057dabf5f61fb221669ecbeda49279) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251224/202512241804.JAJl5a7k-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512241804.JAJl5a7k-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) kernel/cgroup/freezer.c:144:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/cgroup/freezer.c:144:35: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock kernel/cgroup/freezer.c:144:35: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * kernel/cgroup/freezer.c:147:37: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@ kernel/cgroup/freezer.c:147:37: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock kernel/cgroup/freezer.c:147:37: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * >> kernel/cgroup/freezer.c:416:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'sysctl_freeze_timeout_us' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel/cgroup/freezer.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/rcuwait.h, include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h, include/linux/fs/super_types.h, ...): include/linux/sched/signal.h:756:37: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock @@ got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * @@ include/linux/sched/signal.h:756:37: sparse: expected struct spinlock [usertype] *lock include/linux/sched/signal.h:756:37: sparse: got struct spinlock [noderef] __rcu * vim +/sysctl_freeze_timeout_us +416 kernel/cgroup/freezer.c 414 415 #define DEFAULT_FREEZE_RATELIMIT (30 * HZ) > 416 int sysctl_freeze_timeout_us; 417 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki