mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] erofs: don't bother with s_stack_depth increasing for now
Date: Thu,  1 Jan 2026 04:42:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251231204225.2752893-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

Previously, commit d53cd891f0e4 ("erofs: limit the level of fs stacking
for file-backed mounts") bumped `s_stack_depth` by one to avoid kernel
stack overflow, but it breaks composefs mounts, which need erofs+ovl^2
sometimes (and such setups are already used in production for quite long
time) since `s_stack_depth` can be 3 (i.e., FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH
needs to change from 2 to 3).

After a long discussion on GitHub issues [1] about possible solutions,
it seems there is no need to support nesting file-backed mounts as one
conclusion (especially when increasing FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH to 3).
So let's disallow this right now, since there is always a way to use
loopback devices as a fallback.

Then, I started to wonder about an alternative EROFS quick fix to
address the composefs mounts directly for this cycle: since EROFS is the
only fs to support file-backed mounts and other stacked fses will just
bump up `FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH`, just check that `s_stack_depth`
!= 0 and the backing inode is not from EROFS instead.

At least it works for all known file-backed mount use cases (composefs,
containerd, and Android APEX for some Android vendors), and the fix is
self-contained.

Let's defer increasing FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH for now.

Fixes: d53cd891f0e4 ("erofs: limit the level of fs stacking for file-backed mounts")
Closes: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/2087 [1]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAFHtUiYv4+=+JP_-JjARWjo6OwcvBj1wtYN=z0QXwCpec9sXtg@mail.gmail.com
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Larsson <alexl@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/erofs/super.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/super.c b/fs/erofs/super.c
index 937a215f626c..0cf41ed7ced8 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/super.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/super.c
@@ -644,14 +644,20 @@ static int erofs_fc_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
 		 * fs contexts (including its own) due to self-controlled RO
 		 * accesses/contexts and no side-effect changes that need to
 		 * context save & restore so it can reuse the current thread
-		 * context.  However, it still needs to bump `s_stack_depth` to
-		 * avoid kernel stack overflow from nested filesystems.
+		 * context.
+		 * However, we still need to prevent kernel stack overflow due
+		 * to filesystem nesting: just ensure that s_stack_depth is 0
+		 * to disallow mounting EROFS on stacked filesystems.
+		 * Note: s_stack_depth is not incremented here for now, since
+		 * EROFS is the only fs supporting file-backed mounts for now.
+		 * It MUST change if another fs plans to support them, which
+		 * may also require adjusting FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH.
 		 */
 		if (erofs_is_fileio_mode(sbi)) {
-			sb->s_stack_depth =
-				file_inode(sbi->dif0.file)->i_sb->s_stack_depth + 1;
-			if (sb->s_stack_depth > FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH) {
-				erofs_err(sb, "maximum fs stacking depth exceeded");
+			inode = file_inode(sbi->dif0.file);
+			if (inode->i_sb->s_op == &erofs_sops ||
+			    inode->i_sb->s_stack_depth) {
+				erofs_err(sb, "file-backed mounts cannot be applied to stacked fses");
 				return -ENOTBLK;
 			}
 		}
-- 
2.43.5


             reply	other threads:[~2025-12-31 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-31 20:42 Gao Xiang [this message]
2026-01-01 15:52 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-04  3:56   ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-04 10:01     ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-04 10:42       ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-04 18:44         ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-04 21:14           ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-06 17:05             ` [PATCH v2] " Gao Xiang
2026-01-07 14:11               ` Dusty Mabe
2026-01-08  2:26               ` Sheng Yong
2026-01-08  2:32                 ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-08  3:10                   ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-08  8:02                     ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-08  8:05                       ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-08  8:24                         ` Amir Goldstein
2026-01-08  8:34                           ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-08 10:26                         ` David Laight
2026-01-08 12:30                           ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-08  2:38                 ` [PATCH v3] " Gao Xiang
2026-01-08  3:07                 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND] " Gao Xiang
2026-01-08  9:14                   ` Sheng Yong
2026-01-08  9:25                     ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-08  9:30                       ` Sheng Yong
2026-01-08  9:28                   ` Zhiguo Niu
2026-01-08  9:31                     ` Gao Xiang
2026-01-10  1:45                   ` Chao Yu
2026-01-12 12:46                   ` Christian Brauner
2026-01-07 14:32 ` [PATCH] " Alexander Larsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251231204225.2752893-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=alexl@redhat.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®