mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	vschneid@redhat.com
Cc: neelx@suse.com, sean@ashe.io, mproche@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched/fair: Feature to suppress Fair Server for NOHZ_FULL isolation
Date: Mon,  5 Jan 2026 22:42:07 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260106034209.2703289-1-atomlin@atomlin.com> (raw)

Hi Ingo, Peter, Juri, Vincent,

This patch introduces a new scheduler feature, RT_SUPPRESS_FAIR_SERVER,
designed to ensure strict NOHZ_FULL isolation for SCHED_FIFO workloads,
particularly in the presence of resident CFS tasks.

In strictly partitioned, latency-critical environments (such as High
Frequency Trading platforms) administrators frequently employ fully
adaptive-tick CPUs to execute pinned SCHED_FIFO workloads. The fundamental
requirement is "zero OS noise"; specifically, the scheduler clock-tick must
remain suppressed ("offloaded"), given that standard SCHED_FIFO semantics
dictate no forced preemption between tasks of identical priority.

However, the extant "Fair Server" (Deadline Server) architecture
compromises this isolation guarantee. At present, should a background
SCHED_OTHER task be enqueued, the scheduler initiates the Fair Server
(dl_server_start). As the Fair Server functions as a SCHED_DEADLINE entity,
its activation increments rq->dl.dl_nr_running.

This condition compels sched_can_stop_tick() to return false, thereby
restarting the periodic tick to enforce the server's runtime.
To address this, the patch introduces a new scheduler feature control,
RT_SUPPRESS_FAIR_SERVER.

When engaged, this modification amends enqueue_task_fair() to forego the
invocation of dl_server_start() if, and only if, the following conditions
are met:

	1. A Real-Time task (SCHED_FIFO/SCHED_RR) is currently in execution
	2. RT bandwidth enforcement (rt_bandwidth_enabled()) is inactive

By precluding the server's initiation, rq->dl.dl_nr_running is maintained
at zero. This permits the tick logic to defer to the standard SCHED_FIFO
protocol, thereby ensuring the tick remains suppressed.

Considerations: This serves as a precision instrument for specialised
contexts. It explicitly prioritises determinism over fairness. Whilst
enabled, queued CFS tasks shall endure total starvation until such time as
the RT task voluntarily yields. I believe this is acceptable for
partitioned architectures where housekeeping duties are allocated to
alternative cores; however, I have guarded this capability within
CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL and a default-disabled feature flag to obviate the risk
of inadvertent starvation on general-purpose systems.

I welcome your thoughts on this approach.


Aaron Tomlin (1):
  sched/fair: Introduce RT_SUPPRESS_FAIR_SERVER to optimise NOHZ_FULL
    isolation

 kernel/sched/fair.c     | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/sched/features.h |  9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
2.51.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-01-06  3:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-06  3:42 Aaron Tomlin [this message]
2026-01-06  3:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: Introduce RT_SUPPRESS_FAIR_SERVER to optimise " Aaron Tomlin
2026-01-06  9:07 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] sched/fair: Feature to suppress Fair Server for " Shrikanth Hegde
2026-01-06 14:49   ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-01-07  9:48     ` Juri Lelli
2026-01-07 10:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-07 16:26         ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-01-13  1:43         ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-01-06 15:37   ` Valentin Schneider
2026-01-06 16:38     ` Daniel Vacek
2026-01-07 20:25       ` Aaron Tomlin
2026-01-09  9:21         ` Valentin Schneider
2026-01-13 19:15           ` Aaron Tomlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260106034209.2703289-1-atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --to=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mproche@gmail.com \
    --cc=neelx@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sean@ashe.io \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®