From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: jaegeuk@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: fix error path handling in f2fs_read_data_large_folio()
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 22:45:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260108224545.3019a411@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260107214231.24163-1-chao@kernel.org>
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 05:42:31 +0800
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> wrote:
> In error path of f2fs_read_data_large_folio(), if bio is valid, it
> may submit bio twice, fix it.
That isn't the only bug at the bottom of that function.
I think I've unravelled the strange loops on the copy in linux-next.
The 'goto got_it' could be a normal conditional.
The top has:
if (rac)
folio = readahead_folio(rac);
next_folio:
if (!folio)
goto out:
which means you can 'goto out' before setting up a pending 'bio'.
I'm sure that could be made a proper loop - although it would cost an indentation.
Would certainly be better with only one call to readahead_foilio(), perhaps:
next_folio:
if (rac) {
folio = readahead_folio(rac);
if (!folio)
goto out:
}
with just:
if (rac)
goto next_folio;
at the bottom.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index cabaeeb436bd..386d9adfd4bd 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -2568,17 +2568,14 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> folio_unlock(folio);
> return ret;
> }
> -
> +out:
> + f2fs_submit_read_bio(F2FS_I_SB(inode), bio, DATA);
> if (ret) {
> - f2fs_submit_read_bio(F2FS_I_SB(inode), bio, DATA);
> -
> /* Wait bios and clear uptodate. */
> folio_lock(folio);
If I've read the code correctly the 'bio' can contain transfers for a
previous folio(s), and might have transfers for this folio, but might not.
So relocking the folio may just deadlock.
(I've not found the unlock at the end of transfer...)
Quite which 'bio' need the flag changed is another question.
David
> folio_clear_uptodate(folio);
> folio_unlock(folio);
> }
> -out:
> - f2fs_submit_read_bio(F2FS_I_SB(inode), bio, DATA);
> return ret;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-08 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-07 21:42 Chao Yu
2026-01-08 22:45 ` David Laight [this message]
2026-01-09 1:37 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260108224545.3019a411@pumpkin \
--to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®