From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>,
Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Disallow access to vmcs12 fields that aren't supported by "hardware"
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 20:15:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260109041523.1027323-4-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260109041523.1027323-1-seanjc@google.com>
Disallow access (VMREAD/VMWRITE), both emulated and via a shadow VMCS, to
VMCS fields that the loaded incarnation of KVM doesn't support, e.g. due
to lack of hardware support, as a middle ground between allowing access to
any vmcs12 field defined by KVM (current behavior) and gating access based
on the userspace-defined vCPU model (the most functionally correct, but
very costly, implementation).
Disallowing access to unsupported fields helps a tiny bit in terms of
closing the virtualization hole (see below), but the main motivation is to
avoid having to weed out unsupported fields when synchronizing between
vmcs12 and a shadow VMCS. Because shadow VMCS accesses are done via
VMREAD and VMWRITE, KVM _must_ filter out unsupported fields (or eat
VMREAD/VMWRITE failures), and filtering out just shadow VMCS fields is
about the same amount of effort, and arguably much more confusing.
As a bonus, this also fixes a KVM-Unit-Test failure bug when running on
_hardware_ without support for TSC Scaling, which fails with the same
signature as the bug fixed by commit ba1f82456ba8 ("KVM: nVMX: Dynamically
compute max VMCS index for vmcs12"):
FAIL: VMX_VMCS_ENUM.MAX_INDEX expected: 19, actual: 17
Dynamically computing the max VMCS index only resolved the issue where KVM
was hardcoding max index, but for CPUs with TSC Scaling, that was "good
enough".
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com
Cc: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251026201911.505204-22-xin@zytor.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YR2Tf9WPNEzrE7Xg@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 15 +++++----
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs.h | 8 +++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h | 6 ++--
4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 61113ead3d7b..ac7a17560c8f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ static void init_vmcs_shadow_fields(void)
field <= GUEST_TR_AR_BYTES,
"Update vmcs12_write_any() to drop reserved bits from AR_BYTES");
+ if (get_vmcs12_field_offset(field) < 0)
+ continue;
+
/*
* PML and the preemption timer can be emulated, but the
* processor cannot vmwrite to fields that don't exist
@@ -7074,12 +7077,6 @@ void nested_vmx_set_vmcs_shadowing_bitmap(void)
}
}
-/*
- * Indexing into the vmcs12 uses the VMCS encoding rotated left by 6. Undo
- * that madness to get the encoding for comparison.
- */
-#define VMCS12_IDX_TO_ENC(idx) ((u16)(((u16)(idx) >> 6) | ((u16)(idx) << 10)))
-
static u64 nested_vmx_calc_vmcs_enum_msr(void)
{
/*
@@ -7407,6 +7404,12 @@ __init int nested_vmx_hardware_setup(int (*exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *))
{
int i;
+ /*
+ * Note! The set of supported vmcs12 fields is consumed by both VMX
+ * MSR and shadow VMCS setup.
+ */
+ nested_vmx_setup_vmcs12_fields();
+
nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(&vmcs_config, vmx_capability.ept);
if (!cpu_has_vmx_shadow_vmcs())
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs.h
index 9aa204c87661..66d747e265b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs.h
@@ -11,7 +11,15 @@
#include "capabilities.h"
+/*
+ * Indexing into the vmcs12 uses the VMCS encoding rotated left by 6 as a very
+ * rudimentary compression of the range of indices. The compression ratio is
+ * good enough to allow KVM to use a (very sparsely populated) array without
+ * wasting too much memory, while the "algorithm" is fast enough to be used to
+ * lookup vmcs12 fields on-demand, e.g. for emulation.
+ */
#define ROL16(val, n) ((u16)(((u16)(val) << (n)) | ((u16)(val) >> (16 - (n)))))
+#define VMCS12_IDX_TO_ENC(idx) ROL16(idx, 10)
#define ENC_TO_VMCS12_IDX(enc) ROL16(enc, 6)
struct vmcs_hdr {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c
index c2ac9e1a50b3..1ebe67c384ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
FIELD(number, name), \
[ENC_TO_VMCS12_IDX(number##_HIGH)] = VMCS12_OFFSET(name) + sizeof(u32)
-const unsigned short vmcs12_field_offsets[] = {
+static const u16 kvm_supported_vmcs12_field_offsets[] __initconst = {
FIELD(VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR_ID, virtual_processor_id),
FIELD(POSTED_INTR_NV, posted_intr_nv),
FIELD(GUEST_ES_SELECTOR, guest_es_selector),
@@ -158,4 +158,70 @@ const unsigned short vmcs12_field_offsets[] = {
FIELD(HOST_SSP, host_ssp),
FIELD(HOST_INTR_SSP_TABLE, host_ssp_tbl),
};
-const unsigned int nr_vmcs12_fields = ARRAY_SIZE(vmcs12_field_offsets);
+
+u16 vmcs12_field_offsets[ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_supported_vmcs12_field_offsets)] __ro_after_init;
+unsigned int nr_vmcs12_fields __ro_after_init;
+
+#define VMCS12_CASE64(enc) case enc##_HIGH: case enc
+
+static __init bool cpu_has_vmcs12_field(unsigned int idx)
+{
+ switch (VMCS12_IDX_TO_ENC(idx)) {
+ case VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR_ID:
+ return cpu_has_vmx_vpid();
+ case POSTED_INTR_NV:
+ return cpu_has_vmx_posted_intr();
+ VMCS12_CASE64(TSC_MULTIPLIER):
+ return cpu_has_vmx_tsc_scaling();
+ case TPR_THRESHOLD:
+ VMCS12_CASE64(VIRTUAL_APIC_PAGE_ADDR):
+ return cpu_has_vmx_tpr_shadow();
+ VMCS12_CASE64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR):
+ return cpu_has_vmx_virtualize_apic_accesses();
+ VMCS12_CASE64(POSTED_INTR_DESC_ADDR):
+ return cpu_has_vmx_posted_intr();
+ case GUEST_INTR_STATUS:
+ return cpu_has_vmx_virtual_intr_delivery();
+ VMCS12_CASE64(VM_FUNCTION_CONTROL):
+ VMCS12_CASE64(EPTP_LIST_ADDRESS):
+ return cpu_has_vmx_vmfunc();
+ VMCS12_CASE64(EPT_POINTER):
+ return cpu_has_vmx_ept();
+ VMCS12_CASE64(XSS_EXIT_BITMAP):
+ return cpu_has_vmx_xsaves();
+ VMCS12_CASE64(ENCLS_EXITING_BITMAP):
+ return cpu_has_vmx_encls_vmexit();
+ VMCS12_CASE64(GUEST_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL):
+ VMCS12_CASE64(HOST_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL):
+ return cpu_has_load_perf_global_ctrl();
+ case SECONDARY_VM_EXEC_CONTROL:
+ return cpu_has_secondary_exec_ctrls();
+ case GUEST_S_CET:
+ case GUEST_SSP:
+ case GUEST_INTR_SSP_TABLE:
+ case HOST_S_CET:
+ case HOST_SSP:
+ case HOST_INTR_SSP_TABLE:
+ return cpu_has_load_cet_ctrl();
+
+ /* KVM always emulates PML and the VMX preemption timer in software. */
+ case GUEST_PML_INDEX:
+ case VMX_PREEMPTION_TIMER_VALUE:
+ default:
+ return true;
+ }
+}
+
+void __init nested_vmx_setup_vmcs12_fields(void)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kvm_supported_vmcs12_field_offsets); i++) {
+ if (!kvm_supported_vmcs12_field_offsets[i] ||
+ !cpu_has_vmcs12_field(i))
+ continue;
+
+ vmcs12_field_offsets[i] = kvm_supported_vmcs12_field_offsets[i];
+ nr_vmcs12_fields = i + 1;
+ }
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h
index 7a5fdd9b27ba..21cd1b75e4fd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h
@@ -374,8 +374,10 @@ static inline void vmx_check_vmcs12_offsets(void)
CHECK_OFFSET(guest_pml_index, 996);
}
-extern const unsigned short vmcs12_field_offsets[];
-extern const unsigned int nr_vmcs12_fields;
+extern u16 vmcs12_field_offsets[] __ro_after_init;
+extern unsigned int nr_vmcs12_fields __ro_after_init;
+
+void __init nested_vmx_setup_vmcs12_fields(void);
static inline short get_vmcs12_field_offset(unsigned long field)
{
--
2.52.0.457.g6b5491de43-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-09 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-09 4:15 [PATCH v3 0/4] " Sean Christopherson
2026-01-09 4:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: nVMX: Setup VMX MSRs on loading CPU during nested_vmx_hardware_setup() Sean Christopherson
2026-01-09 11:24 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-01-09 4:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: VMX: Add a wrapper around ROL16() to get a vmcs12 from a field encoding Sean Christopherson
2026-01-09 11:34 ` Xiaoyao Li
2026-01-09 4:15 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-01-09 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Disallow access to vmcs12 fields that aren't supported by "hardware" Xiaoyao Li
2026-01-09 14:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-01-09 15:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-01-09 4:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: nVMX: Remove explicit filtering of GUEST_INTR_STATUS from shadow VMCS fields Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260109041523.1027323-4-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®