From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBB52E22AA; Fri, 9 Jan 2026 07:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767944726; cv=none; b=I5EJ+pVpyPBQgSNRy2XVUa/7lms40Zu5qv4RmUMUudp66a0wVHUOa15bNhsdyz8ukKBPAq1ulQkCZaRYKi+39sHWGaiyJL2zDUKgMp6hHYHNlSfQzBZLz4v2M0J9e7u+8FPcxxT2DfCXgf7JviDzIL6/fshNYMyWbiYxiRHFrLo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767944726; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B9AuQJTXV9wQV7VS4Se1Qf45TehA6mrvp6M/nzMRcdI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=f6QMXtj9qhFmKcC9pEQLP3m0aHjHksi/a0ipTBPMtPsE2za2NqMO2z/bmJR+sTFczYHHcvsyh5wfp0R9WnQjCGJJkLlzHoJDaaR+1ZBjFCAnpC303PLAAt3JzfZy9Pcb70YkYXg/QYMkvzWGmyHYYBYl/CmUtfBkEoyauRr2mEk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=mR2bxLcc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="mR2bxLcc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1767944724; x=1799480724; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=B9AuQJTXV9wQV7VS4Se1Qf45TehA6mrvp6M/nzMRcdI=; b=mR2bxLccs1bfZmW6UeZgDXA24tugPQ5CxemNGpCcERaIDMQSyT/x+yof bHhPNyccha2aQCMSlMprg04VdHx5EVDGiT00FFmLIuEUhy+puy1wDmOUB +PVRREZ+hZv9we/+H7c9F82uLN/DZNCzqGhp1RvN24ev+UbdTxAqud/Bc OTJZ62qgFEeT/VXNbelTt+DjSdEoVbrJwuMCjEIsgdaM7+oGCsMWhLSLN fvqXV0R++A5BnSsg+jof4kyQ7cVKDUJVKhrnlO2ZYXwZFXm4S9GRTOWnC xx/JeK5v9+IcpYupk5sGKwqg4EzvijW426xA2zRwxzlgm3QoOPHlk+Hof A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: G6ENd4vAT9+LXXFo3eQwOQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: buBwe7HTR06ILkaGRm0NCA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11665"; a="86912509" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,212,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="86912509" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Jan 2026 23:45:24 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +++36T+mSqqo6gfRQWD6Qg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 54QTaAWYQ+SKatFi2ottTw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,212,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="207941505" Received: from igk-lkp-server01.igk.intel.com (HELO 92b2e8bd97aa) ([10.211.93.152]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2026 23:45:20 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 92b2e8bd97aa with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ve7BO-0000000021A-0u91; Fri, 09 Jan 2026 07:45:18 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2026 08:45:15 +0100 From: kernel test robot To: Benno Lossin , Gary Guo , Miguel Ojeda , Boqun Feng , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Roy Baron , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross , Danilo Krummrich , Fiona Behrens , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alban Kurti Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] rust: pin-init: rewrite `#[pin_data]` using `syn` Message-ID: <202601090815.gvBfNWeh-lkp@intel.com> References: <20260108135127.3153925-7-lossin@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260108135127.3153925-7-lossin@kernel.org> Hi Benno, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on rust/rust-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.19-rc4 next-20260109] [cannot apply to rust/pin-init-next] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Benno-Lossin/rust-pin-init-allow-the-crate-to-refer-to-itself-as-pin-init-in-doc-tests/20260108-234753 base: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux rust-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260108135127.3153925-7-lossin%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 06/12] rust: pin-init: rewrite `#[pin_data]` using `syn` config: x86_64-rhel-9.4-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260109/202601090815.gvBfNWeh-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261) rustc: rustc 1.88.0 (6b00bc388 2025-06-23) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260109/202601090815.gvBfNWeh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202601090815.gvBfNWeh-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> warning: hidden lifetime parameters in types are deprecated --> rust/pin-init/internal/src/pin_data.rs:24:33 | 24 | fn parse(input: syn::parse::ParseStream) -> Result { | ------------^^^^^^^^^^^ | | | expected lifetime parameter | = note: `-W elided-lifetimes-in-paths` implied by `-W rust-2018-idioms` = help: to override `-W rust-2018-idioms` add `#[allow(elided_lifetimes_in_paths)]` help: indicate the anonymous lifetime | 24 | fn parse(input: syn::parse::ParseStream<'_>) -> Result { | ++++ -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki